2004
DOI: 10.1080/09658210344000477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of ageing on the recollection of emotional and neutral pictures

Abstract: This study investigated age-related differences in recognition memory for emotional and neutral pictures. Younger and older participants were asked to rate pictures according to their emotional valence, arousal, and visual complexity. Two weeks later they had to recognise these pictures and the states of awareness associated with memory were assessed with the "remember/know/guess" paradigm. We found that, although the influence of emotion on recognition accuracy (as assessed by d') was similar in both age grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

27
114
4
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
27
114
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with previous studies that investigated the influence of emotion on the recall or recognition of pictures similar to those used in the present study (e.g., Bradley, Greenwald, Petry, & Lang, 1992;Comblain et al, 2004;Dolcos, LaBar, & Cabeza, 2004;Hamann, Ely, Grafton, & Kilts, 1999;Ochsner, 2000). This difference in item memory between emotional and neutral pictures may involve mechanisms such as enhanced attention to, and hence encoding of, emotional items as well as enhanced consolidation or storage of emotional items, mechanisms that are thought to be underlain by a specific neuro-hormonal system (McGaugh & Cahill, 2003;Phelps, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with previous studies that investigated the influence of emotion on the recall or recognition of pictures similar to those used in the present study (e.g., Bradley, Greenwald, Petry, & Lang, 1992;Comblain et al, 2004;Dolcos, LaBar, & Cabeza, 2004;Hamann, Ely, Grafton, & Kilts, 1999;Ochsner, 2000). This difference in item memory between emotional and neutral pictures may involve mechanisms such as enhanced attention to, and hence encoding of, emotional items as well as enhanced consolidation or storage of emotional items, mechanisms that are thought to be underlain by a specific neuro-hormonal system (McGaugh & Cahill, 2003;Phelps, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, memory for temporal information was better for negative than for positive pictures. Earlier studies that used stimuli from the IAPS found that negative pictures were richly recollected (as assessed by "remember" responses) more often than positive ones (Comblain et al, 2004;Ochsner, 2000), which is consistent with our findings. However, using words as stimuli, we found in a previous study that memory for color information and spatial location was as those included in the IAPS are known to elicit significant levels of emotional arousal (e.g., Bradley, Codispoti, Cuthbert, & Lang, 2001), which may in turn enhance memory (McGaugh & Cahill, 2003), whereas emotional words typically do not elicit much emotional arousal (except for specific types of words such as "taboo words"; and may instead influence memory because their affective meaning makes them more semantically related (e.g., Maratos, Allan, & Rugg, 2000;Phelps et al, 1998) or more distinctive (Dewhurst & Parry, 2000) relative to neutral words.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, although some studies have found that emotion enhances correct recognition accuracy (e.g., Ochsner, 2000), a number of others found no advantage for emotional material (Comblain, D'Argembeau, Van der Linden, & Aldenhoff, 2004;Pesta et al, 2001;Windmann & Kutas, 2001), and still others have found lower recognition accuracy for negative than neutral words (Maratos, Allen, & Rugg, 2000). Our findings add to the growing consensus that when pure-list designs are used, negative-emotional material does not enjoy an advantage in true recall or recognition relative to neutral words.…”
Section: Recognitionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…On the other hand, contrary to this hypothesis, there was no age by emotional valence interaction for item errors. Some previous studies exploring the positivity bias in LTM experiments also did not observe a differential positivity effect in elderly participants relative to young participants (Comblain, D"Argembeau, Van der Linden, & Aldenhoff, 2004;Denburg, Buchanan, Tranel, & Adolphs, 2003;Kensinger et al, 2002). It should be noted that the (lack of) age-related differences that was observed in this study is difficult to interpret because the two groups differed in terms of positive affect (as assessed by PANAS questionnaire), the young group rating higher on the positive dimension than the elderly group .…”
Section: < Insert Figure 2 About Here >mentioning
confidence: 99%