2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of accessible oxygen over Co3O4–CeO2 catalysts on the steam reforming of ethanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter, could be possibly related to the strong metal-support interactions, maintaining the Co species in an oxidized state (Co δ`s pecies). This factor could be considered responsible for the adequate ESR performance of Co/CeO 2 catalysts, in agreement with relevant literature studies [42][43][44][88][89][90][91].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter, could be possibly related to the strong metal-support interactions, maintaining the Co species in an oxidized state (Co δ`s pecies). This factor could be considered responsible for the adequate ESR performance of Co/CeO 2 catalysts, in agreement with relevant literature studies [42][43][44][88][89][90][91].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, Co/SiO 2 catalysts demonstrated superior reforming performance, despite their limited reducibility at low temperatures due to the strong metal-support interactions [90]. Along the same lines, it has been demonstrated that the oxygen storage capacity of the support can greatly affect the reforming performance of Co-based catalysts by promoting the gasification of carbon deposits [88,91]. To this end, the superior ESR performance of Co/CeO 2 catalysts as compared to ZrO 2 -or Al 2 O 3 -based samples has been ascribed to the abundance of redox sites on the catalyst surface [36,40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations using Scherrer's method for the (111) reflection of CeO 2 show that the ceria crystallite size became smaller, 17.1 nm for 2% Co/ ceria, and 10.7 nm for the 10% Co/ceria catalyst (Table 1). While the high temperature hydrogen treatments (reduction) play an important role in the disruption phenomenon, the oxidation step did not cause such a dramatic effect: for the 10% Co/ceria catalyst, the ceria particle size decreased from 27.6 to 16.9 nm upon oxidation of the calcined Co-containing sample at 673 K. In agreement with a literature observation, 63 Co-oxides and metallic Co particles are difficult to distinguish in HRTEM from the CeO 2 particles, due to the low contrast and the above mentioned significant dissolution. For the Rh-Co bimetallic cases, a similar broadening of the ceria reflections takes place, though to a lesser extent than for Co/ceria samples ( Fig.…”
Section: Characterization By Powder X-ray Diffraction (Xrd) and Transsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…illustrates the % yield of the produced gases from the SRF with CeCoO x catalysts with various Ce/Co contents in the mixed oxides. In general, Co has been found to be an effective catalyst for H 2 production from the SRRs of alcohol, where the Co site was proposed to be the active site for C–C scissions , . As seen in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%