2005
DOI: 10.1134/1.1856709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a corona discharge on a lightning attachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the striking distances with the critical radius concept (for critical radius of 0.36 m [4] and 0.28 m [13]), the Rizk generalized leader inception equation [5] and the field intensification criterion of Petrov and Waters [15,16] are computed at the downward leader tip height where each criterion is satisfied. The Bazelyan and Raizer's equation [17,35] and the Lalande's stabilization field equation [18] are not evaluated in this paper since they are based on the concept of a stabilization field in static conditions. Even though the striking distance for these two models could be estimated as the height of the downward leader tip that produces an average background field over the height of the rod equal to the stabilization field, this assumption is not valid for structures larger than about 50 m [19].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Effective Striking Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the striking distances with the critical radius concept (for critical radius of 0.36 m [4] and 0.28 m [13]), the Rizk generalized leader inception equation [5] and the field intensification criterion of Petrov and Waters [15,16] are computed at the downward leader tip height where each criterion is satisfied. The Bazelyan and Raizer's equation [17,35] and the Lalande's stabilization field equation [18] are not evaluated in this paper since they are based on the concept of a stabilization field in static conditions. Even though the striking distance for these two models could be estimated as the height of the downward leader tip that produces an average background field over the height of the rod equal to the stabilization field, this assumption is not valid for structures larger than about 50 m [19].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Effective Striking Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since thunderclouds are mostly negatively charged, high electric fields are often induced on grounded tall objects, producing positive glow corona discharges. It has been suggested that the transition from glow corona to streamers is vital when investigating the initiation of upward lightning [5][6][7][8][9][10]. For the above-mentioned reasons, it is of great interest to evaluate the conditions required for the transition from stable glow corona to streamers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the space charge produced at the tip of grounded structures may influence the initiation of upward leaders [105][106][107], the space charge left behind the rocket also affects the leader inception conditions in triggered lightning experiments as shown in Paper I. This effect had not been taken into consideration by any other leader inception model before.…”
Section: On the Validity Of The Existing Leader Inception Models For mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even though extensive work has been done on the local space charges created by corona at the tip of a grounded object [105][106][107], a thorough analysis of the effect of the space charge layer on the inception of upward leaders is not available in the literature. Thus, Paper VI presents the simulation of the space charge layer created during a thunderstorm and the analysis of its influence on the thundercloud electric fields required to incept upward lightning positive leaders from tall towers.…”
Section: The Space Charge Layer and The Initiation Of Upward Lightningmentioning
confidence: 99%