2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of 3-Dimensional Simulation on Neurosurgical Skill Acquisition and Surgical Performance: A Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical models can achieve anatomical accuracy, especially with the engineering tools available today. Three-D printing allows us to create reproducible models that can be subjected to real-world manipulation 8. Some physical models are incredibly ornate, such as the traumatic brain injury model used during a course at CNS and the Vascular Simulations Replicator (Stony Brook, NY, USA).…”
Section: Simulation In Neurosurgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical models can achieve anatomical accuracy, especially with the engineering tools available today. Three-D printing allows us to create reproducible models that can be subjected to real-world manipulation 8. Some physical models are incredibly ornate, such as the traumatic brain injury model used during a course at CNS and the Vascular Simulations Replicator (Stony Brook, NY, USA).…”
Section: Simulation In Neurosurgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have consistently demonstrated that the use of simulators improves qualitative and quantitative performance measures as well as overall resident and surgeon confidence in clinical settings. [ 35 38 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Moreover, VRE may provide a 3D representation of traditional 2D radiological imaging, so improving the comprehension of the patient-specific anatomy. [32][33][34][35] A meta-analysis of 36 studies, including 28 RCTs and 2226 participants, showed that 3D visualization technology was associated with higher factual knowledge, better results in spatial knowledge acquisition, increased user satisfaction and growth of the learners' perception of tool effectiveness, respectively, with the following standardized mean differences: 0.30 (95% CI 0.02-0.62), 0.50 (95% CI 0.20-0.80), 0.28 (95% CI 0.12-0.44), and 0.28 (95% CI 0.14-0.43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, VRE may provide a 3D representation of traditional 2D radiological imaging, so improving the comprehension of the patient-specific anatomy. 32-35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%