2005
DOI: 10.2307/3660525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Edwardsean Tradition and the Antislavery Debate, 1740-1865

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They define 19th-century moderates as follows: “Generally, they were colonizationists (in favor of sending blacks back to Africa) and gradualists (in favor of freeing blacks only after certain goals had been accomplished over an indeterminate time). They were strongly anti-immediatist, sometimes asserting that immediatism was a greater sin than immediatists asserted slavery was.” See Minkema and Stout (2005, p. 66).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They define 19th-century moderates as follows: “Generally, they were colonizationists (in favor of sending blacks back to Africa) and gradualists (in favor of freeing blacks only after certain goals had been accomplished over an indeterminate time). They were strongly anti-immediatist, sometimes asserting that immediatism was a greater sin than immediatists asserted slavery was.” See Minkema and Stout (2005, p. 66).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%