The economics of producing sustainable aviation fuel: a regional case study in Queensland, Australia

Abstract

The airline industry has a strong interest in developing sustainable aviation fuels, in order to reduce their exposure to increasing oil prices and cost liability for greenhouse gas emissions. The feasibility and cost of producing sustainable biomass-based jet fuels at a sufficient scale to materially address these issues is an enormous challenge. This paper builds directly on the biophysical study by H.Rye, In review, which examined a 25 year scale-up strategy to produce 5% of projected jet fuel demand in Australia in 2020 (470 mL) in the Fitzroy region of Queensland, Australia. The strategy was based on the use of a mixed ligno-cellulosic biomass feedstock and assumed, for the sake of exploring and quantifying the scenario, a simplified two-step conversion processconversion of biomass to crude bio-oil within the region, and upgrade to jet fuel at a central Brisbane facility. This paper provides details on the costs of production in this scenario, focusing on two different strategies for biomass utilization, and two types of novel small-medium scale conversion technologies. The cost analyses have taken into account technology learning curves, different economies of scale and key cost sensitivities. The cost of biomass-based jet fuels is estimated to be between 0.70 and 1.90 $ L À1 when the efficiency of conversion of biomass to biocrude and subsequently to aviation fuel is varied by AE10% of published values, with an average value of 1.10 $ L À1. This is within the range of the projected 2035 conventional jet fuel price of 1.50 $ L À1 . Therefore, biomass-based jet fuel has the potential to contribute to supply of Australia's jet fuel needs in the future.

Quantifying spatial dependencies, trade‐offs and uncertainty in bioenergy costs: An Australian case study (1) – least cost production scale

“…Learning would occur not only for biofuel processing, which is highly capital intensive, but also for harvesting. Biofuel supply cost curves may decrease over time in line with learning rates for biofuel processing . The methodological challenge is due to the interdependence between costs and installed capacity, mediated via competition with other technologies.…”

Quantifying spatial dependencies, trade‐offs and uncertainty in bioenergy costs: an Australian case study (2) – National supply curves

“…Three alternatives for smoothing agricultural feedstock annual variability have been considered in some depth in Hayward et al Processing facilities can be conservatively sized for the minimum reliable feedstock production – limiting biofuel production in years with higher residue yields. Alternatively, capital can be sized for average feedstock production, where excess feedstock is stockpiled in more productive years.…”

“…Finally, a variable feedstock, such as crop residue, can be supplemented with woody feedstock – from forestry or plantations (e.g. short rotation coppice), scheduling the harvesting for bioenergy use . Then biofuel production would be sized for the (time) average of feedstock from aggregating both crop residue and forestry productio…”

Economics of Oil Production from Pongamia (Millettia pinnata) for Biofuel in Australia

“…This method is useful for novel products or commodities with variable production and no historical data from an established market from which price may be readily discovered for estimating revenues [20,24,26,33].…”