1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-750x(99)00086-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economics of Air Pollution Health Risks in Russia: A Case Study of Volgograd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a developing country context, Ostro et al (1996) obtained essentially the same result for Santiago, Chile. Using this information, Larson et al (1999) developed an initial particulate coefficient (PC) equal to 8.5*10 -6 to estimate the additional annual mortality risk per person per year per 1 µg/m 3 of PM 10 . To our knowledge, there are no separate estimates for children and adults available in the literature.…”
Section: Valuing Mortality Risk Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a developing country context, Ostro et al (1996) obtained essentially the same result for Santiago, Chile. Using this information, Larson et al (1999) developed an initial particulate coefficient (PC) equal to 8.5*10 -6 to estimate the additional annual mortality risk per person per year per 1 µg/m 3 of PM 10 . To our knowledge, there are no separate estimates for children and adults available in the literature.…”
Section: Valuing Mortality Risk Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of studies in the region conducted in 1996-2008 have estimated health risks from air pollution in Russia and Ukraine [1][2][3][4][5][6]. These studies generally conclude that there are significant health risks attributable to environmental pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avaliani and Revich [14] proposed a 0.55 conversion coefficient to convert TSP into PM 10 for Russia. This value is slightly below the 0.6 conversion coefficient suggested in Larson et al [15] for Russia and Strukova et al [16] proposed for Ukraine. Because many former Soviet regions have more combustion-related activities than average, a higher conversion coefficient was used than that for the world average 0.5 [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Further conversions of PM 10 estimates to PM 2.5 include greater uncertainty in relation to the original data in the emissions inventory (i.e., TSP). In Russia, the PM 2.5 / PM 10 ratio has been estimated to range from 0.55 to 0.75 [15,17]. For this article we have chosen a conversion ratio of 0.65 (i.e., a ratio in the middle of that range) for estimates of PM 10 to PM 2.5 with the resulting modeled estimates for TSP and all conversions to smaller particle sizes shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation