2000
DOI: 10.1080/136067100375713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic importance of major sports events: a case-study of six events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
141
0
19

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
141
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…A host of scholars conclude that while there are some positive economic and legacy impacts (Lee and Taylor 2005;Ritchie 2000), the urban economic impact is variable, intangible and ambiguous at best (Andranovich et al 2001;Gratton et al 2000Gratton et al , 2001Gratton et al , 2006. The purported legacy of mega-events (including social and economic legacies) has a lot to do with the 'element of the attraction' occasioned by the event, and to an extent has been achieved in some cases (Ritchie 2000).…”
Section: Development Impacts Of Mega-events: Reflections From the Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A host of scholars conclude that while there are some positive economic and legacy impacts (Lee and Taylor 2005;Ritchie 2000), the urban economic impact is variable, intangible and ambiguous at best (Andranovich et al 2001;Gratton et al 2000Gratton et al , 2001Gratton et al , 2006. The purported legacy of mega-events (including social and economic legacies) has a lot to do with the 'element of the attraction' occasioned by the event, and to an extent has been achieved in some cases (Ritchie 2000).…”
Section: Development Impacts Of Mega-events: Reflections From the Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with scholars, sport events are classified into five typologies. The categories from A to D ( [25], p. 26) have the common wording "major", intended as importance of the consequences of the sport events even if not all major events can have as many major economic implications. This classification was implemented by Wilson ([2], p. 68), who added a fifth category (category E), which takes into consideration minor events, with local consequences, as reported in Table 1 (adapted from Gratton et al [25] and Wilson [2]).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kai kurių mokslininkų darbuose (Bodet, Lacassagne 2012;Horne 2007;Xing, Chalip 2006;Misener, Mason 2006), cituojant Ch. Gratton, N. Dobson, S. Shibli (2000), išskiriami šie sporto renginių organizatoriams tenkantys privalumai: šalies miestų atsinaujinimas ruošiantis renginiams; šalies pristatymas tarptautiniu mastu (reputacijos pakeitimo galimybė); ša-lies patekimas į organizuojamų sporto renginių istoriją; turistų pritraukimas; potenciali galimybė skatinti turistus sugrįžti; tiesioginis ekonominis poveikis; infrastruktūros atnaujinimas; naujų statinių sukūrimas; potencialios galimybės naujiems renginiams organizuoti; naujų investuotojų pritraukimas.…”
Section: Tarptautinių Sporto Renginių Reikšmė Ir Jų Organizavimo Tikslaiunclassified