2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic consequences of mutual help in extended families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, there is a large literature emphasizing the important role that these networks continue to play in economic affairs in sub-Saharan Africa (for recent studies on the subject, see, for example, di Bulte (2011, 2013); Baland et al (2013)). But evolution in the composition of the household raises the question whether nuclear family households, in any fundamental way, operates differently from extended family households.…”
Section: Evolution Of Household Composition In West Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, there is a large literature emphasizing the important role that these networks continue to play in economic affairs in sub-Saharan Africa (for recent studies on the subject, see, for example, di Bulte (2011, 2013); Baland et al (2013)). But evolution in the composition of the household raises the question whether nuclear family households, in any fundamental way, operates differently from extended family households.…”
Section: Evolution Of Household Composition In West Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any given y, the maximum transfer that i is willing to make in a selfenforcing agreement is increasing in δ ij , because a larger value of δ ij translates into a stronger preference for the expenditures made by j and the same applies to j. 5 Consequently, it can be shown that larger δ ij , δ ji values will lead to greater consumption smoothing. In the extreme, if δ ij = δ ji = 1 and δ ic = δ jc , we obtain efficient risk-sharing within the group.…”
Section: The Effect Of Stronger Ties Within the Householdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Key to such informal arrangements are that they are reciprocal, involve state-contingent resource transfers towards those facing negative shocks and they are efficiency enhancing. Such kinship tax distortions have been documented to exist across a range of household decisions including those related to consumption (DiFalco andBulte, 2011), savings (Boltz-Lemmel, 2013), labour market participation (Baland et al, 2015) and capital allocations into family enterprises (Squires, 2016). In contrast to risk-sharing transfers, such resource flows need not be reciprocal or be channelled towards poorer network members and, most importantly, their existence typically entails efficiency costs through distortions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%