The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union: Challenges to Democracy?¹

Abstract

Recent scholarship assesses the impact of the European Union's conditionality on democracy in Central and Eastern Europe in a contradictory way. On one hand, the EU is perceived as a key agent of successful democratic consolidation and on other hand, the return of nationalist and populist politics in new member states has been explored in the context of the negative consequences of the hasty accession that undermined government accountability and constrained public debate over policy alternatives. This article explains this puzzle of the ambiguous effects of the EU's politics of conditionality, which promoted institutions stabilizing the horizontal division of powers, rule of law, human and minority rights protection, but which neglected norms and rules of participatory and/or popular democracy.

The European Union and Democracy Promotion in the Middle East and North Africa Countries: Bridging the Gap Between Constructivism and Realism

“…According to the Treaty on European Union, in this sense the EU uses the instruments of the normative power to put demands on countries to take steps for democratic reforms, while its main tools are creating incentives such as economic benefits or promises to be a member of the EU. The EU used democracy reforms as a condition in making its enlargement decisions in Eastern Europe (Malová & Dolný, 2008). The constructivist theory of international relations highlights the role of norms in promoting normative change in international relations by shaping the choices and acts that constitute a political order and rejecting realist assumptions regarding norms' effects.…”

Finding the roots of neo-traditionalist populism in Poland: ‘Cultural displacement’ and European integration

“…Popular sovereignty was, therefore, sacrificed in the name of pluralism and institutionalism; the process of democratisation visibly leaned towards the liberal tradition of democracy. Popular control and government accountability became limited mainly to elections (Malová and Dolný, 2011). As parliaments played a little role, the political debate became useless and political parties conformed to similar ‘centrist’ positions while anti-system parties were excluded.…”

Unpacking Normative Resonance: The Attitudinal Panopticon and the Implementation Gap of LGBT Rights in Serbia

“…In relation to the rule of law, they found that the 'instrumentalization of reforms' by local empowered yet unaccountable elites may lead to an abuse and politicization of newly created state structures, especially when the EU measures progress in outcomes rather than the processes of reforms (Mendelski 2016). In relation to social dialogue, Grosse (2010) and Malová and Dolný (2008) also hold that the EU accession process had a contradictory impact in Central and Eastern European countries. While the EU aimed at promoting the involvement of civil society in policy making, the technocratic character of the enlargement process achieved the opposite.…”