2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.09.20096412
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Early Food Insecurity Impacts of COVID-19

Abstract: BackgroundCOVID-19 has disrupted food access and impacted food insecurity, which is associated with numerous adverse individual and public health outcomes. MethodsWe conducted a statewide population-level survey in Vermont from March 29-April 12, 2020, during the beginning of a statewide stay-at-home order. We utilized the USDA six-item validated food security module to measure food insecurity before COVID-19 and since COVID-19. We assessed food insecurity prevalence and reported food access challenges, coping… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
133
3
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
133
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results demonstrate that the experience of food insecurity was not limited to only those on low incomes, and that loss of income at any level above 25% contributed to substantially higher odds of experiencing food insecurity. Results from a survey in the north-eastern US state of Vermont, identified a 33% increase in food insecurity since the beginning of the pandemic, with 24% of households experiencing food insecurity (up from 18%) [ 27 ]. A Canadian survey [ 28 ] conducted during April–May 2020 found that almost one in seven (14.6%) Canadians experienced food insecurity to some degree in the previous 30 days, and those who had reduced employment due to COVID-19, were more likely to be food insecure (28.4%) than those who were working (10.7%) [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results demonstrate that the experience of food insecurity was not limited to only those on low incomes, and that loss of income at any level above 25% contributed to substantially higher odds of experiencing food insecurity. Results from a survey in the north-eastern US state of Vermont, identified a 33% increase in food insecurity since the beginning of the pandemic, with 24% of households experiencing food insecurity (up from 18%) [ 27 ]. A Canadian survey [ 28 ] conducted during April–May 2020 found that almost one in seven (14.6%) Canadians experienced food insecurity to some degree in the previous 30 days, and those who had reduced employment due to COVID-19, were more likely to be food insecure (28.4%) than those who were working (10.7%) [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars, including Bakalis et al [ 12 ], Berkowitz et al [ 151 ], Gundersen and Ziliak [ 152 ], and Garcia et al [ 153 ], associate undernourishment with adverse health outcomes, including chronic conditions, mental health challenges, and increased risk of mortality. Niles et al [ 154 ] found that lower economic access to food forced many food-insecure households to disrupt eating, cut meals, eat less to stretch their food, or even go hungry. This link between the cost of a diet and food security status has an important impact on individual health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 36 ]. Niles et al [ 37 ] further stressed that the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic affects all the four dimensions of food security, defined by the United Nations [ 38 ], namely availability, accessibility, utilization and stability. The changing consumer behavior linked to the panic buying and stockpiling incidents are already affecting the food availability in the short term, but in the long term other challenges in terms of food import–export, etc.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For poor people specifically, the increased food costs and closure of informal food markets may impact their food utilization in terms of reduced diet quality and nutrition intake. Lastly, the stability of food supply is also threatened by COVID-19 due to varied reasons, as already discussed [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%