2010
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1284557928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics theorem for CMC surfaces in $R^3$

Abstract: In this paper, we study the space of translational limits T (M ) of a surface M properly embedded in R 3 with nonzero constant mean curvature and bounded second fundamental form. There is a natural map T which assigns to any surface Σ ∈ T (M ), the set T (Σ) ⊂ T (M ). Among various dynamics type results we prove that surfaces in minimal T -invariant sets of T (M ) are chord-arc. We also show that if M has an infinite number of ends, then there exists a nonempty minimal T -invariant set in T (M ) consisting ent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the sequence has locally bounded norm of the second fundamental form in R 3 . By a standard argument, a subsequence of the surfaces converges to a weak H-lamination L of R 3 ; see the references [20,25,32] for this argument and the Appendix for the definition and some key properties of a weak H-lamination that we will apply below.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and the sequence has locally bounded norm of the second fundamental form in R 3 . By a standard argument, a subsequence of the surfaces converges to a weak H-lamination L of R 3 ; see the references [20,25,32] for this argument and the Appendix for the definition and some key properties of a weak H-lamination that we will apply below.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further background material on these notions see Section 3 of [18], [25] or our previous papers [32,33]. Definition 6.1.…”
Section: Both Lines Have Multiplicity Twomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material covered here is based on [149] by Meeks and Tinaglia, which was motivated by the earlier work in [122] and we refer the reader to [149] for further details. We will focus our attention here on some of the less technical results in [149] and the basic techniques developed there.…”
Section: Remark 97mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sections 10 and 11 we cover some results of Meeks and Tinaglia mentioned previously, as well as their Dynamics and Minimal Elements Theorems for complete strongly Alexandrov embedded 1-surfaces in R 3 from [149]. This Minimal Elements Theorem is needed in the proofs of the curvature and radius estimates stated previously in Theorems 1.6 and 1.7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A standard compactness argument, see for instance Section 2.1 in this manuscript or the paper [24], gives that a subsequence of ∆ n converges with multiplicity one to a genus zero, strongly Alexandrov embedded 1 1-surface ∆ ∞ with bounded norm of the second fundamental form. By the Minimal Element Theorem in [24], for some divergent sequence of points q n ∈ ∆ ∞ , the translated surfaces ∆ ∞ − q n converge with multiplicity one to a strongly Alexandrov embedded surface ∆ ∞ in R 3 such that the component passing through 0 is an embedded Delaunay surface. Since a Delaunay surface has nonzero flux, we conclude that the original disks D n also have nonzero flux for n large, which is a contradiction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%