2016
DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2016-0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit lamination theorems for H-surfaces

Abstract: In this paper we prove a theorem concerning lamination limits of sequences of compact disks M n embedded in R 3 with constant mean curvature H n , when the boundaries of these disks tend to infinity. This theorem generalizes to the non-zero constant mean curvature case Theorem 0.1 by Colding and Minicozzi [8]. We apply this theorem to prove the existence of a chord arc result for compact disks embedded in R 3 with constant mean curvature; this chord arc result generalizes Theorem 0.5 by Colding and Minicozzi i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(114 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can travel quickly up and down the horizontal levels of the limiting surfaces only along the helicoidal columns in much the same way that some parking garages are configured for traffic flow; hence, the name parking garage structure. Parking garage structures also appear as natural objects in the main results of the papers [11,13,39].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can travel quickly up and down the horizontal levels of the limiting surfaces only along the helicoidal columns in much the same way that some parking garages are configured for traffic flow; hence, the name parking garage structure. Parking garage structures also appear as natural objects in the main results of the papers [11,13,39].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Section 5 includes some applications of Theorem 1.1. We refer the reader to [23,24,25,26,27,36,38,40] for further applications of Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either M n has locally bounded norm of the second fundamental form in R 3 or not. If M n does NOT have locally bounded norm of the second fundamental form in R 3 then by Theorem 1.5 in [22], the surfaces M n converge on compact subsets of R 3 to a minimal parking garage structure of R 3 with two oppositely oriented columns, see Figure 1 and see for instance [12] for a detailed description of this limit object. Figure 1: Parking garage structure: in this picture, the sequence of surfaces on the left hand side converge smoothly away from the union S 1 ∪ S 2 or two straight lines orthogonal to the foliation of horizontal planes described on the right hand side.…”
Section: The Local Geometry Around Singular Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If M n has locally bounded norm of the second fundamental form in R 3 then by applying Theorem 1.3 in [22] and after replacing by a subsequence, the surfaces M n converge with multiplicity one or two on compact subsets of R 3 to a properly embedded minimal surface M ∞ , in the sense that any sufficiently small normal neighborhood of any smooth compact domain Ω of the limit surface must intersect M n in one or two components that are small normal graphs over Ω for n large. Moreover M ∞ has bounded norm of the second fundamental form, genus at most g and its injectivity radius at the origin is one.…”
Section: The Local Geometry Around Singular Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation