The dynamics of trade and competition

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Statement of purpose:The purpose of these working papers is to promote the circulation of research results (Research Series) and analytical studies (Documents Series) made within the National Bank of Belgium or presented by external economists in seminars, conferences and conventions organised by the Bank. The aim is therefore to provide a platform for discussion. The opinions expressed are strictly those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bank of Belgium. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bank of Belgium. AbstractWe present, extend and estimate a model of international trade with firm heterogeneity in the tradition of Melitz (2003) and Melitz and Ottaviano (2005). The model is constructed to yield testable implications for the dynamics of international prices, productivity levels and markups as functions of openness to trade at a sectoral level. The theory lends itself naturally to a difference in differences estimation, with international differences in trade openness at the sector level reflecting international differences in the competitive structure of markets. Predictions are derived for the effects of both domestic and foreign openness on each economy. Using disaggregated data for EU manufacturing over the period 1989-1999 we find evidence that trade openness exerts a competitive effect, with prices and markups falling and productivity rising. Consistent with theory however, these effects diminish and may even revert in the longer term as less competitive economies become attractive havens from which to export from. We provide evidence that this entry into less open economies induces pro-competitive effects overseas in response to domestic trade liberalization. JEL-code : E31, F12, F15, L16.

International trade without CES: Estimating translog gravity

“…Feenstra and Weinstein (2010) provide theory as well as evidence for the US. Badinger (2007) as well as Chen, Imbs and Scott (2009) provide evidence for European countries. This line of research emphasizes more flexible demand systems that respond to changes in the competitive environment.…”

Estimating Unequal Gains across U.S. Consumers with Supplier Trade Data

“…This evidence suggests that import penetration may have pro-competitive effects. However, other recent papers have found that increased international competition may also raise domestic markups, providing estimates of anti-competitive effects (Chen et al (2009), De Loecker et al (2014, De Loecker et al (2016)). None of these papers present evidence on the U.S. case.…”

Technological change, rent and income inequalities: A Schumpeterian approach

“…Such barriers limit competition in the domestic markets, and consequently, overall growth dynamics. Greater foreign competition, visible through the increase in imports, makes markups decline and, thus, also profit margins fall (Chen et al, 2009). Large empirical evidence confirms a positive relationship between the share of imports to GDP and competition (e.g.…”