1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf00412533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of the coronary venous pressure in the dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure wave in each cardiac cycle had two peaks, which corresponded to the 'a' and 'v' waves of Tiedt, Litwin & Skolakinska (1966). The 'v' wave was maximal about 90 msec after the QRS complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pressure wave in each cardiac cycle had two peaks, which corresponded to the 'a' and 'v' waves of Tiedt, Litwin & Skolakinska (1966). The 'v' wave was maximal about 90 msec after the QRS complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resting coronary venous pressure With the Morawitz cannula in place in the mouth of the coronary sinus, and with free flow of venous blood through it, the recorded coronary venous pressure wave was small in amplitude, and the pressures were never more than 10-15 mm Hg systolic and 05 mm Hg diastolic. The pressure wave in each cardiac cycle had two peaks, which corresponded to the 'a' and 'v' waves of Tiedt, Litwin & Skolakinska (1966). The 'v' wave was maximal about 90 msec after the QRS complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They ranged from 16-20 mm in animals of 10-16-5 kg. 362 Coronary Sinus Distension 363 Coronary venous pressure The amplitude of the pressure waves recorded via the cannula, with its terminal balloon deflated, were similar to those recorded by Tiedt et al [1966] who used an indwelling catheter (2 mm o. d.) without through flow, and were typically less than 10-15 mm Hg systolic and less than 0.5 mm Hg diastolic. There was therefore no outflow obstruction when the cannulae were in place.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…They ranged from 16-20 mm in animals of 10-16-5 kg. Tiedt et al [1966] who used an indwelling catheter (2 mm o. d.) without through flow, and were typically less than 10-15 mm Hg systolic and less than 0.5 mm Hg diastolic. There was therefore no outflow obstruction when the cannulae were in place.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissection may disturb the parasympathetic fibres to the coronary vessels, whilst cannulation can influence the coronary outflow resistance and venous pressure (26) and thereby coronary perfusion pressure. Myocardial metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%