2015
DOI: 10.1177/1354068815603240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamics of party relabeling

Abstract: Contrary to longstanding arguments that equate parties with durable, information-rich brand names, the relabeling of parties is not rare, and in many countries it is not even very unusual. This paper provides the first effort to document this neglected phenomenon. It finds that across European democracies roughly a third of all parties have relabeled themselves at least once since 1945, and a similar proportion of elections include at least one party running under a new name. It then presents analyses of why p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Country and year selection I test my hypotheses on 18 Western European countries from 1945 to 2019. I focus on Western Europe because, while Eastern European parties do change their name (Kim & Solt, 2016), the region's unique political history and relatively inchoate party system means that the logic and effects of rebranding might be different from Western Europe. I include all parties in these countries which competed in two or more elections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Country and year selection I test my hypotheses on 18 Western European countries from 1945 to 2019. I focus on Western Europe because, while Eastern European parties do change their name (Kim & Solt, 2016), the region's unique political history and relatively inchoate party system means that the logic and effects of rebranding might be different from Western Europe. I include all parties in these countries which competed in two or more elections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument has been tested in the literature. For example, Kim and Solt (2016) find that ‘electoral shocks’ or large deviations from a party's average electoral performance increase the probability of a party changing its name. It is intuitive that this logic also extends to policy rebrands given that electoral losses predict policy shifts more generally (Budge, 1994; Somer‐Topcu, 2009).…”
Section: A Rebranding Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Party name changes are often the exponent of a broader identity change. They can indeed be seen as an attempt of the party to rebrand and to present itself to the electorate with renewed commitments (Kim and Solt, 2017). In order to embody this new identity, the party selectorates can be assumed to look for new candidates.…”
Section: Hypothesis 3a: Party Leadership Change Increases the Odds Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%