The Dynamics of Intra-jurisdictional Relations in the Inuit Regions of the Canadian Arctic: An Institutionalist Perspective

Abstract

One of the most exciting developments in Canadian federalism has been the emergence of Aboriginal self-governing regions. This paper constructs a theoretical framework for exploring the evolution of intra-jurisdictional relations in the self-governing Inuit regions of the Canadian Arctic. Intra-jurisdictional relations in these regions are characterized by a unique set of relationships between elected governments and organizations that represent the beneficiaries of land-claims agreements. Using the literature on historical institutionalism, we argue that the nature of Inuit intra-jurisdictional relations following the establishment of self-government can be explained by the institutional choices made prior to the signing of land-claims agreements and/or self-government agreements. To illustrate the potential of our framework for analysing Inuit intra-jurisdictional relations, we briefly examine the experiences of Nunavut, an Inuit-dominated region and the newest territory in the Canadian federation.

Media Coverage of Environmental and Social Change in Northern Norway’s Coastal Regions: Main Themes in National and International News

“…One can argue that the government's high North policies promote the view that justice and collaboration and responsible management will solve all challenges. From a political science perspective, this viewpoint rests on a belief in institutionalism, that is, the belief that international relations can be handled through negotiations and agreed upon rules (e.g., Alcantara and Wilson, 2014). Conversely, it negates or suppresses a geopolitical realism perspective in fear of the potential implications (e.g., Guzzini, 2013), namely that the Arctic nations are all part of a power game in which each nation first and foremost seeks to secure their own domestic economic interests.…”

Negotiating Aboriginal Self-Government Agreements in Canada: An Analysis of the Inuvialuit Experience

“…We draw upon the literature on historical institutionalism to explore the effects of Canada's evolving land claims policy and other contextual factors on self-government negotiations with the Inuvialuit. At the core of this literature is the idea that institutions—defined as formal and informal procedures, norms and conventions that structure the relationship between actors in a political community—emerge out of “concrete temporal processes” that reflect a particular political and social context (Alcantara and Wilson, 2014: 46; Hall and Taylor, 1996; Thelen, 1999: 37). This is an inclusive definition of institutions, extending beyond structural relationships of different orders of government or governance and other actors, to include procedural, conventional and normative rules such as public policies (see Benz, 2013; Hodgson, 2006).…”

Indigenous Research and Academic Freedom: A View from Political Scientists

“…However, as time progressed, they became more normative in their approach, providing philosophical arguments for and against the recognition of certain types of political, legal, and economic rights, sometimes perpetuating colonialism and racism, and sometimes resisting these phenomena (Borrows, 2002;Cairns, 2000;Flanagan, 2000;Macklem, 2001). These legal and normative perspectives continue to dominate the literature (Alfred, 2008;Asch, 2014;Coulthard, 2014;Turner, 2006), but have been augmented by a new generation of scholars interested in explaining variation between communities as well as stability and change as they relate to Indigenous political mobilization, public policies, and institutions (Alcantara & Wilson, 2013;Morden, 2013;Papillon, 2012;Slowey, 2008).…”