The Dynamics of Design- Knowledge Construction: The Case of a Freshman Architectural-Design Studio in Egypt

Abstract

Reviewing the literature indicates a lack of studies that explicitly describe the dynamics of design-knowledge construction in architectural pedagogy. Accordingly, this study attempts to empirically explore the process of constructing design-knowledge within a freshman architectural-design studio in the Egyptian context. In the spring 2020 semester, interpretive qualitative research was initially conducted in an on-campus setting, followed by a period within an online setting, after the COVID-19 lockdown. A total of 12 students, in addition to four teaching assistants and the course instructor, were involved in this study. Multiple data-gathering tactics, such as field observations, semi-structured interviews, and document archives were employed. Conventional content analysis was adopted, in order to extract the patterns that describe the design-knowledge construction within the case under investigation. The study revealed ten themes within three categories: students’ learning activities, faculty-pedagogical strategies, and social interactions. This paper discusses one theme from each of these categories: (1) students’ recourse to self-directed learning, (2) the faculty’s coaching within the educational setting, and (3) the studio’s socio-communal cohesion. The findings of this study confirmed that the construction of design-knowledge is an integrally situated process, which cannot be studied without the presence of all its various components. Such a study presents a contribution that could inform future pedagogical initiatives which aim to create stimulating architectural learning environments in a post-pandemic reality.

Incorporating Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) into Common Practices for Architects and Building Engineers

“…The online platforms used -such as Zoom, Moodle, and Miro -provided a suitable context in which to carry out the project online. This positive impact of online platforms was mentioned by Bakir et al (2021), thereby highlighting the qualities that these platforms can offer the educational context (Haridy et al, 2022). However, the students did encounter certain difficulties in the collaborative task, as asynchronous work did not always favor communication between peers.…”

The Role of Adaptive E-Learning Co-Design as Main Solution to Higher Education’s Marketing Performance

“…E-learning may provide an excellent opportunity for education managers, lecturers, and students to share the responsibilities of strengthening learning and promotion to achieve sustainable marketing performance. AEC assists students in overcoming time constraints, geographic, affordability, and physical disability (Haridy et al, 2022;Rahmani et al, 2021).…”

McLuhan’s Tetrad as a Tool to Interpret the Impact of Online Studio Education on Design Studio Pedagogy

“…There are studies examining students' evaluations and attitudes toward online design studios during the pandemic, highlighting the uncertainties and the need for additional support and guidance [9,10], providing insights into the future direction of architecture studio education post-COVID-19, and emphasizing the importance of feedback studies, innovation in studio teaching, and a new model for post-pandemic studio education [11]. Additionally, researchers delved into the dynamics of design knowledge construction within contemporary architectural pedagogy, emphasizing the necessity of online and hybrid learning [12], and other researchers explored the potential of virtual design studios in the context of the COVID-19 lockdown, highlighting the emerging potential of this approach [13,14]. The studies collectively underscore the need for innovative approaches, feedback mechanisms, and support systems to enhance the effectiveness of online and hybrid design studio education post-COVID-19.…”