2022
DOI: 10.1175/jpo-d-21-0312.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamics of a Barotropic Current Impinging on an Ice Front

Abstract: The vertical front of ice shelves represents a topographic barrier for barotropic currents that transport a considerable amount of heat towards the ice shelves. The blocking effect of the ice front on barotropic currents has recently been observed to substantially reduce the heat transport into the cavity beneath the Getz Ice Shelf. We use an idealized numerical model to study the vorticity dynamics of an externally forced barotropic current at an ice front and the impact of ice shelf thickness, ice front stee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an apparent link between seasonal variations in both the baroclinic and barotropic ASC strength and flow into the Fimbulisen cavity (Figure 9a). While not investigated here in detail, this link may include an intricate interplay between the local bathymetry at the sills (Eisermann et al., 2020; Nøst, 2004), bottom Ekman transport anomalies (Núñez‐Riboni & Fahrbach, 2009; Smedsrud et al., 2006) and potential vorticity constraints (Daae et al., 2017; Steiger et al., 2022; Wåhlin et al., 2020). Furthermore, a seasonal counter‐current at depth, neither observed at DML shallow nor at DML deep , but observed by Heywood et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an apparent link between seasonal variations in both the baroclinic and barotropic ASC strength and flow into the Fimbulisen cavity (Figure 9a). While not investigated here in detail, this link may include an intricate interplay between the local bathymetry at the sills (Eisermann et al., 2020; Nøst, 2004), bottom Ekman transport anomalies (Núñez‐Riboni & Fahrbach, 2009; Smedsrud et al., 2006) and potential vorticity constraints (Daae et al., 2017; Steiger et al., 2022; Wåhlin et al., 2020). Furthermore, a seasonal counter‐current at depth, neither observed at DML shallow nor at DML deep , but observed by Heywood et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10a). This displacement is expected to vary seasonally, as the potential vorticity constraint depends on stratification (Steiger et al, 2022) and baroclinicity (Hattermann et al, 2014, estimated by velocity shear at M1, Fig. 10d).…”
Section: Favorable Conditions For Warm Eventsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We hypothesize that the seasonal interplay of the ASC with the ice shelf plays a role in setting up favorable conditions for WDW intrusions at times other than at the externally forced thermocline depth minimum. Recent observational and modeling studies have highlighted the role of conservation of potential vorticity for the interaction of the ASC with an ice shelf (Wåhlin et al, 2020;Steiger et al, 2022). As the ASC follows contours of water column thickness (Thompson et al, 2018), the presence of Trolltunga may displace the upstream ASC (Fig.…”
Section: Favorable Conditions For Warm Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rapid changes in water column thickness near ice shelf and glacier tongues modify local angular momentum balances (van Heijst, 1987). Strong potential vorticity gradients occur at ice-shelf fronts (Steiger et al, 2022), where the ice draft may be greater than half the local seabed depth. The ice creates a barrier against which water may pool and a strong along-front flow may develop (Malyarenko et al, 2019).…”
Section: Topographic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%