2007
DOI: 10.2307/25148808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamic Structure of Management Support Systems: Theory Development, Research Focus, and Direction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 207 publications
1
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout this paper, it was shown that there are some factors deteriorate BI system performance and lead to a huge loss in the invested money. These factors, techno-business, are mostly based on the lack of Planning and scope definition [23] Adoptiong of incremental delivery approch [23] Building a pilot system [31] Project schedule [25] Teamwork Team skills [31] External consultants Business domain committed experise [9] Infrastructure Source systems [16] [23] Technical framework [23] Development of technology and tools [16] System functionality [27] BI tools [29] BI cost [27][25] BI system usability [27] Problem space match [28] Data Data quality and reliable resources [16] [20] Modeling of dimensional data and meta-data Information area readiness [9] organizations' readiness toward BI systems. Thus, the paper reviewed and investigated some possible scenarios that may affect the readiness for BI systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this paper, it was shown that there are some factors deteriorate BI system performance and lead to a huge loss in the invested money. These factors, techno-business, are mostly based on the lack of Planning and scope definition [23] Adoptiong of incremental delivery approch [23] Building a pilot system [31] Project schedule [25] Teamwork Team skills [31] External consultants Business domain committed experise [9] Infrastructure Source systems [16] [23] Technical framework [23] Development of technology and tools [16] System functionality [27] BI tools [29] BI cost [27][25] BI system usability [27] Problem space match [28] Data Data quality and reliable resources [16] [20] Modeling of dimensional data and meta-data Information area readiness [9] organizations' readiness toward BI systems. Thus, the paper reviewed and investigated some possible scenarios that may affect the readiness for BI systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we found need for adapting the model. Clark et al (2007) mentioned that user involvement improves user satisfaction, but it does not necessarily lead to a productive usage. They argue that user commitment is a better predictor for successful IS implementation, since committed users pursue a successful usage of the IS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the implementation of ICs, the User Involvement Strategy should rather focus on the development of user commitment. This can be realized by Sponsors and Champions from usersside and executive-side, who promote the innovation (Clark et al, 2007). The DIP management already integrates department managers in the community management and promotes this fact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can use quite different technologies and may support different managerial constituencies" (Arnott and Pervan, 2005 p. 68). Clark, Jones and Armstrong (2007) recognised the need to develop dynamic theoretical models for support systems development such as DSS and related technologies such as EIS (executive support systems), KMS (knowledge management systems) and business intelligence (BI). Their conceptual model (Clark et al, 2007) aimed not only to provide core and fundamental elements such as business process, organisational members, technology and organisational outcomes but also to capture the decision making environment and the use of these systems.…”
Section: Designation Of '(Is) Design Research' Vs '(Is) Designmentioning
confidence: 99%