2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-015-0526-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dynamic epitranscriptome: A to I editing modulates genetic information

Abstract: Adenosine to inosine editing (A to I editing) is a cotranscriptional process that contributes to transcriptome complexity by deamination of adenosines to inosines. Initially, the impact of A to I editing has been described for coding targets in the nervous system. Here, A to I editing leads to recoding and changes of single amino acids since inosine is normally interpreted as guanosine by cellular machines. However, more recently, new roles for A to I editing have emerged: Editing was shown to influence splici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another post-transcriptional modification, A-to-I RNA editing 49 , commonly occurs in introns, UTRs, and Alu elements. It plays an important role in splicing and regulating innate immunity 50,51 and is associated with epilepsy, autism, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer 52 . NGS detects A-to-I editing as a nucleotide variant in cDNA sequences (A-to-G).…”
Section: Modification Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another post-transcriptional modification, A-to-I RNA editing 49 , commonly occurs in introns, UTRs, and Alu elements. It plays an important role in splicing and regulating innate immunity 50,51 and is associated with epilepsy, autism, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer 52 . NGS detects A-to-I editing as a nucleotide variant in cDNA sequences (A-to-G).…”
Section: Modification Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction and characterization of ADAR and/or apobec as recognition elements of RNA chips for detection of base mutations could illuminate for instance which specific target organ or group of tissues bear the mutation and when, comparing eventually mutation analysis under physiological and toxicological conditions. It could also compare genomic and RNA templates, investigating evolutionary and functional aspects of exon (coding) versus intron (non-coding) RNA editing or how fast a non-silent base mutation can occur and drastically affect the proteome repertoire [ 96 , 97 ]. A cytidine deaminase edits C to U to permit proper folding and functionality of RNA in archaean bacteria such as Methanopyrus kandleri [ 98 ].…”
Section: Biosensing Expression Of Tissue-specific Rna Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rather than permanent DNA mutations or reversible RNA modifications, RNA editing has its own limited lifespan and results in more permanent modification [102]. Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing (A-to-I editing), also called I, is catalysed by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) [101,103,104]. Recently, 1741 I sites have been reported in CD regions of transcripts from RNA-seq data of different human tissues [105].…”
Section: And Umentioning
confidence: 99%