2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015jg003185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dual role of soil crusts in desertification

Abstract: Vegetation cover in dry regions is a key variable in determining desertification. Soils exposed to rainfall by desertification can form physical crusts that reduce infiltration, exacerbating water stress on the remaining vegetation. Paradoxically, field studies show that crust removal is associated with plant mortality in desert systems, while artificial biological crusts can improve plant regeneration. Here it is shown how physical crusts can act as either drivers of or buffers against desertification dependi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(91 reference statements)
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical soil crust formation can mitigate the negative impact of biocrust disturbance on downstream vegetation performance by providing similar or even larger amounts of water to downstream vegetation, as observed by Cortina et al () after two years of biocrust manipulation. However, this effect strongly depends on the interplay of runoff with local microtopography and slope gradient and the efficiency of downstream vegetation in intercepting and retaining runoff (Assouline et al, ; Chen et al, ). Thus, on longer time scales, and especially in highly erodible substrates, such as those in the Tabernas badlands (Cantón et al, ; Canton et al, 2014), high denudation rates in bare areas not covered by biocrust (Lázaro et al, ) and the large amount of sediment expected to be deposited under vegetation canopies under these conditions may promote the formation of microtopographical mounds below the plant canopy (Bedford & Small, ; Bochet, Poesen, & Rubio, ; Rossi & Ares, ), partially obstructing water and nutrient fluxes into vegetation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physical soil crust formation can mitigate the negative impact of biocrust disturbance on downstream vegetation performance by providing similar or even larger amounts of water to downstream vegetation, as observed by Cortina et al () after two years of biocrust manipulation. However, this effect strongly depends on the interplay of runoff with local microtopography and slope gradient and the efficiency of downstream vegetation in intercepting and retaining runoff (Assouline et al, ; Chen et al, ). Thus, on longer time scales, and especially in highly erodible substrates, such as those in the Tabernas badlands (Cantón et al, ; Canton et al, 2014), high denudation rates in bare areas not covered by biocrust (Lázaro et al, ) and the large amount of sediment expected to be deposited under vegetation canopies under these conditions may promote the formation of microtopographical mounds below the plant canopy (Bedford & Small, ; Bochet, Poesen, & Rubio, ; Rossi & Ares, ), partially obstructing water and nutrient fluxes into vegetation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their improved soil properties combined with the direct effect of plant roots and stems make water infiltration and storage better than in open spaces (Thompson, Harman, Troch, Brooks, & Sivapalan, ). This hydrological dichotomy between open and vegetated patches controls the location of vegetation within the landscape and leads to a two‐phase system in which, during effective rainfall events, runoff is mainly generated on very often crusted open areas (sources) and redistributed towards vegetation patches (sinks) where it infiltrates (Assouline et al, ; Chen, Sela, Svoray, & Assouline, ; Ludwig et al, ; Mayor, Bautista, Small, Dixon, & Bellot, ; Puigdefabregas, Sole, Gutierrez, Del Barrio, & Boer, ; Rodríguez‐Caballero, Cantón, Lazaro, & Solé‐Benet, ; Thompson et al, ). Source‐sink interaction maximizes resource availability for plants and is critical for system functioning on a larger scale, reducing water, sediment and nutrient losses from runoff (Chen et al, ; Chen, Sela, Svoray, & Assouline, ; Magliano, Breshears, Fernandez, & Jobbagy, ) and increasing productivity (Ludwig et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Runoffrunon mechanisms can enhance infiltration volumes by a factor of eight times compared with rainfall (Galle et al, 1999;Niemeyer et al, 2014). These mechanisms are often essential for the maintenance of vegetation in otherwise arid regions (Thompson et al, 2010b;Assouline et al, 2015). They are often biologically mediated, primarily through the formation of biological soil crusts (Belnap, 2006).…”
Section: Water Inputs and Losses Across The Soil Atmosphere Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, re‐infiltration, called run‐on, is ignored in most LSMs; runoff production that occurs at sites where the infiltration capacity is exceeded may re‐infiltrate in the grid cell due to soil and land surface heterogeneity so that not all of the runoff that is generated at a grid cell needs to be routed out of the cell or to a receiving water body. A classic example is the run‐on in vegetation patches or bands (strips) in semiarid regions (Assouline et al, 2015). Roots can increase the local infiltration capacity so that runoff from sealed, unvegetated areas can infiltrate in vegetated areas (Nimmo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%