1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3690-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method

Abstract: Computational Engineering has grown in power and diversity in recent years, and for the engineering community the advances are matched by their wider accessibility through modern workstations.The aim of this series is to provide a clear account of computational methods in engineering analysis and design, dealing with both established methods as well as those currently in a state of rapid development.The series will cover books on the state-of-the-art development in computational engineering and as such will co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
448
0
25

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 508 publications
(475 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
448
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea to extend the method of approximate particular solution (MAPS) in [1] for locally supported radial kernel is similar to the construction of the DRBEM [14], in which the operator of Laplacian is retain as main operator on the left, and all the other terms are shifted to right side. We consider the following elliptic partial differential equation in 2D…”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea to extend the method of approximate particular solution (MAPS) in [1] for locally supported radial kernel is similar to the construction of the DRBEM [14], in which the operator of Laplacian is retain as main operator on the left, and all the other terms are shifted to right side. We consider the following elliptic partial differential equation in 2D…”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain a particular solution for the displacements in the case when instead of equation (2) we have its inhomogeneous version, namely the Poisson equation ∆T = Q, where Q is a given heat source, or the heterogeneous conductivity equation ∇ · (κ(x)∇T ) = 0, one would have to use a more general purpose method such asthe multiple reciprocity [21] or the dual reciprocity BEMs [22].…”
Section: The Methods Of Fundamental Solutions (Mfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for the anisotropic Brinkman equation, Khor et al [26] deduced fundamental solutions in the transformed Fourier space, which reduce to the isotropic fundamental solutions in the real space when χ 1 = χ 2 [27,62]. However, the transformation of these functions to the real space in the anisotropic case is not a trivial problem and to avoid these difficulties, a boundary-domain integral formulation in terms of the Stokes fundamental solutions is considered for the Brinkman equation and the resulting domain integral is transformed into a boundary integral using DR-BEM [42]. The integral formulation is as follows:…”
Section: Integral Equation Formulations and Numerical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%