2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-009-9560-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Vaginismus

Abstract: Vaginal spasm has been considered the defining diagnostic characteristic of vaginismus for approximately 150 years. This remarkable consensus, based primarily on expert clinical opinion, is preserved in the DSM-IV-TR. The available empirical research, however, does not support this definition nor does it support the validity of the DSM-IV-TR distinction between vaginismus and dyspareunia. The small body of research concerning other possible ways or methods of diagnosing vaginismus is critically reviewed. Based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
74
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is apparent that teasing apart the relationship between genital pain and sexual dysfunction in women with PVD will remain a needed focus of future research and the FSFI may not be the best scale with which to do this. There is certainly debate as to whether genital pain should be classified as a sexual dysfunction or a pain disorder 37 , although it will remain a sexual dysfunction in the DSM-5 38,39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent that teasing apart the relationship between genital pain and sexual dysfunction in women with PVD will remain a needed focus of future research and the FSFI may not be the best scale with which to do this. There is certainly debate as to whether genital pain should be classified as a sexual dysfunction or a pain disorder 37 , although it will remain a sexual dysfunction in the DSM-5 38,39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision was based on the conclusion that the two disorders could not be reliably differentiated, for two main reasons. Firstly, the diagnostic formulation of vaginismus as "vaginal muscle spasm" was not supported by empirical evidence [18]. Secondly, fear of pain or fear of penetration is commonplace in clinical descriptions of vaginismus [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the diagnostic formulation of vaginismus as "vaginal muscle spasm" was not supported by empirical evidence [18]. Secondly, fear of pain or fear of penetration is commonplace in clinical descriptions of vaginismus [18]. Kaplan even describes it as «phobic avoidance» [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they are considered to be distinct disorders, diagnosis made for one of them would be expected to exclude the diagnosis of the other. However, there is no empirical evidence that superficial dysparenuia can reliably be differentiated from vaginismus both for research and clinical purposes (27,28). The significant overlap between vaginismus and superficial dysparenuia on symptom dimensions make it almost impossible to reliably differentiate one from the other leaving the clinicians to consider whether they might lie on the same continuum with superficial dyspareunia sometimes extending to vaginismus (29).…”
Section: Diagnostic Criteria For Substance-induced Sexual Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%