All Days 2014
DOI: 10.2118/167933-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Drilling Business Model: Driver or Inhibitor of Performance and Innovation

Abstract: The drilling business model has recently become the "elephant in the room" as drilling systems automation advances seek an integrator and technology / performance enhancements seek rewards. The day rate model has been adapted many times over the life of the industry but none of these adaptions has prevailed.The business model entails a number of key aspects that drive business behaviors in the supply chain; control, liability, risk, revenue. Some companies have the approach that the operations team drives the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides the team with an identified opportunity well beyond the traditional deficiency rectification through NPT reduction. The methodologies that enable drilling teams to improve performance through focusing on an aggressive target and collectively developing / implementing solutions to cross the gap from current performance to that target have been publicized (Bond et al 1996, de Wardt et al 2000, de Wardt 2004, de Wardt 2014. They include a rigorous process, extensive engineering of solutions, establishment of a strong team, an ЉenablingЉ team environment, supportive contract management and courage to trust the approach.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides the team with an identified opportunity well beyond the traditional deficiency rectification through NPT reduction. The methodologies that enable drilling teams to improve performance through focusing on an aggressive target and collectively developing / implementing solutions to cross the gap from current performance to that target have been publicized (Bond et al 1996, de Wardt et al 2000, de Wardt 2004, de Wardt 2014. They include a rigorous process, extensive engineering of solutions, establishment of a strong team, an ЉenablingЉ team environment, supportive contract management and courage to trust the approach.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opportunities from new technologies may require small modifications in the contribution of several parties and is difficult to achieve considering commercially and timewise detachment players. The larger changes that major players can realize may require significant changes to roles and responsibilities (de Wardt, 2014). However, once benefit is shown, changes are more achievable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%