The downside of tobacco control? Smoking and self-stigma: A systematic review

Abstract

Objective Little is known about the consequences of tobacco smoking stigma on smokers and how smokers may internalize smoking-related stigma. This review summarizes existing literature on tobacco smoking self-stigma, investigating to what extent smokers are aware of negative stereotypes, agree with them and apply them to themselves. Methods We carried out a systematic search of Pubmed/Web of Science/PsycInfo databases for articles related to smoking self-stigma through June 2013. Reference lists and citations of included studies were also checked and experts were contacted. After screening articles for inclusion/exclusion criteria we performed a quality assessment and summarized findings according to the stages of self-stigma as conceptualized in Corrigan’s progressive model of self-stigma (aware, agree, apply and harm). Initial searches yielded 570 articles. Results Thirty of these articles (18 qualitative and 12 quantitative studies) met criteria for our review. Awareness of smoking stigma was virtually universal across studies. Coping strategies for smoking stigma and the degree to which individuals who smoke internalized this stigma varied both within and across studies. There was considerable variation in positive, negative, and non-significant consequences associated with smoking self-stigma. Limited evidence was found for subgroup differences in smokingrelated stigma. Conclusion While there is some evidence that smoking self-stigma leads to reductions in smoking, this review also identified significant negative consequences of smoking self-stigma. Future research should assess the factors related to differences in how individuals respond to smoking stigma. Public health strategies which limit the stigmatization of smokers may be warranted.

The gendered experience of smoking stigma: implications for tobacco control

“…Accounts of concealing smoking were common in narratives, perhaps suggesting that a number of participants had internalized the ascribed negative characteristics of smoking, resulting in shame, and were attempting to avoid stigmatizing encounters (Evans-Polce, Castaldelli-Maia, Schomerus, & Evans-Lacko, 2015). …”

Electronic Cigarette Use among Current Smokers: A Pilot Qualitative Study

“…Social norms and stigmatization of smoking play powerful rule in initiation, reduction, and cessation of combustible cigarette smoking. 15,16 The perceived social acceptability was a clear motivation to try e-cigarettes. Moreover, a strong theme among all participants’ first-time use of e-cigarettes was the presence of a “convincing” person.…”

Potential unintended consequences of graphic warning labels on sugary drinks: do they promote obesity stigma?

“…Similar arguments have been made in the context of anti‐smoking campaigns and the promotion of lung cancer stigma, with some suggesting that creators of interventions are ethically responsible for minimizing the stigmatizing impact of the campaigns that they promote . Indeed, there is evidence that anti‐smoking campaigns have increased the stigmatization of smoking and while some have argued that this has increased their effectiveness , others have provided evidence of unintended negative consequences for smokers who have internalized this stigma .…”