2003
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.2.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression.

Abstract: A general method is presented for comparing the relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Dominance analysis (D. V. Budescu, 1993), a procedure that is based on an examination of the R2 values for all possible subset models, is refined and extended by introducing several quantitative measures of dominance that differ in the strictness of the dominance definition. These are shown to be intuitive, meaningful, and informative measures that can address a variety of research questions pertaining to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
875
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 822 publications
(936 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
875
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…If explanatory variables are correlated, this does not hold anymore. For this case, Azen and Budescu (2003) propose to estimate the additional contribution of an explanatory variable by estimating the average R 2 increase of adding the variable to all regression models that contain a subset of the other explaining variables. For n explanatory variables one obtains 2 n − 1 semipartial correlation estimates for each variable, which are averaged.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If explanatory variables are correlated, this does not hold anymore. For this case, Azen and Budescu (2003) propose to estimate the additional contribution of an explanatory variable by estimating the average R 2 increase of adding the variable to all regression models that contain a subset of the other explaining variables. For n explanatory variables one obtains 2 n − 1 semipartial correlation estimates for each variable, which are averaged.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For n explanatory variables one obtains 2 n − 1 semipartial correlation estimates for each variable, which are averaged. Azen and Budescu (2003) propose a special averaging method that conserves additivity, so that the sum of all squared semipartial correlations adds up to R 2 . Moreover, the variation of the squared semipartial correlations constitutes a proxy for the collinearities between the explanatory variables and can serve as a form of uncertainty estimation.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if there are three predictors (A, B, and C), then predictor C can be added to four possible subset models (i.e., containing only the intercept term, intercept and predictor A, intercept and predictor B, and intercept and predictors A and B, respectively). A predictor's general dominance weight (GDW; Azen & Budescu, 2003) is found by averaging the squared semipartial correlations across all of the possible subset models. This measure indexes a variable's contribution to the prediction of the dependent variable, by itself and in combination with the other predictors.…”
Section: Visual-only Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they recommend the use of dominance weights (e.g. see Azen & Budescu, 2003). These weights are designed to compare the relative importance of predictors in a multiple regression model and are based on the average increase in the criterion variance that is explained when a given predictor is added to models containing subsets of the other predictors.…”
Section: Influence Of Advicementioning
confidence: 99%