2019
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2019.01375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The divergent effects of work stress on constructive voice and defensive voice: A cross-level of moderated mediation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two theoretical contributions are made in this study. First, while most of the research on employee voice have studied positively-intended voice (Ma, 2016;Maynes & Podsakoff, 2014), this study contributes to the small but expanding body of research on Maynes and Podsakoff's (2014) negative voice behaviour of defensive voice (Bharanitharan et al, 2019;Déprez et al, 2019;Duan et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021;Lu et al, 2019;Ma, 2016;Ng et al, 2021;Unler & Caliskan, 2019) by showing a negative relationship between PO (job-based) or PO (organisationbased) and negatively-intended defensive voice to supervisor. Second, although current literature has reported a moderating effect of PDO on several relationships featuring employee voice as the criterion variable (Botero & Van Dyne, 2009;Lin et al, 2019) and PO as the mediating variable (Liu et al, 2012), to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the earliest study to show the moderating effect of employee PDO on the relationships between PO (organisation-based and job based) and defensive voice to supervisor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two theoretical contributions are made in this study. First, while most of the research on employee voice have studied positively-intended voice (Ma, 2016;Maynes & Podsakoff, 2014), this study contributes to the small but expanding body of research on Maynes and Podsakoff's (2014) negative voice behaviour of defensive voice (Bharanitharan et al, 2019;Déprez et al, 2019;Duan et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021;Lu et al, 2019;Ma, 2016;Ng et al, 2021;Unler & Caliskan, 2019) by showing a negative relationship between PO (job-based) or PO (organisationbased) and negatively-intended defensive voice to supervisor. Second, although current literature has reported a moderating effect of PDO on several relationships featuring employee voice as the criterion variable (Botero & Van Dyne, 2009;Lin et al, 2019) and PO as the mediating variable (Liu et al, 2012), to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the earliest study to show the moderating effect of employee PDO on the relationships between PO (organisation-based and job based) and defensive voice to supervisor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Also, when an employee perceives a decrease in ethical leadership, he/she expresses defensive voice through increased contempt for organisation (Ng et al, 2021). Lu et al (2019) found that work stress perceived by an employee contributed to defensive voice, and this relationship was mediated by ego depletion. In addition to the predicting role of negative attributes such as contempt for organisation, decreased ethical leadership (Ng et al, 2021) and work stress (Lu et al, 2019) in defensive voice, Bharanitharan et al (2019) showed that positive attributes such as leader humility may also contribute to defensive voice, through mediating effects of follower's feeling of being trusted and follower's self-efficacy.…”
Section: Psychological Ownership and Defensive Voice To Supervisormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…“I feel a great deal of stress because of my job.” is an example item. Lu and colleagues (2019) reported good reliability (α = .86) among Chinese working adults. Cronbach’s α is .74 and .80.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%