1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4734-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distances of the Magellanic Clouds

Abstract: The present status of our knowledge of the distances to the Magellanic Clouds is evaluated from a post-Hipparcos perspective. After a brief summary of the effects of structure, reddening, age and metallicity, the primary distance indicators for the Large Magellanic Cloud are reviewed: The SN 1987A ring, Cepheids, RR Lyraes, Mira variables, and Eclipsing Binaries. Distances derived via these methods are weighted and combined to produce final "best" estimates for the Magellanic Clouds distance moduli.Comment: In… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopted the spectral type to temperature calibration and bolometric correction from Schmidt-Kaler (1982). The LMC distance modulus was taken to be 18.5 (see Walker 1999).…”
Section: The Hr-diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted the spectral type to temperature calibration and bolometric correction from Schmidt-Kaler (1982). The LMC distance modulus was taken to be 18.5 (see Walker 1999).…”
Section: The Hr-diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the calibration of T eff and the bolometric correction for luminosity class III stars (Schmidt-Kaler 1982) to the resulting three estimates of (B − V) 0 for every object. Extinction due to dust with R V = 3.0 and a LMC distance modulus of 18.50 was adopted (for a recent discussion about the LMC distance determination, see Walker 1999).…”
Section: The Derivation Of the Elhc Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More uncertain is the distance to the supernova. This is uncertain to ∼10% (Walker 1998;Lundqvist & Sonneborn 2001), and a conservative limit is given by Gibson (2000), corresponding to an uncertainty in the line flux of ∼27%. Because the modeled f 26µm scales almost linearly with M ( 44 Ti) (Sect.…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%