2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distance puzzle: on the interpretation of the distance coefficient in gravity equations

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
64
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They argue, in line with the gravity approach, that the driving force behind globalization is not lower distance-barriers, but increased dispersion of economic mass around the globe. More recently, Buch et al (2004) argue against the notion of a distance-puzzle in that globalization may work as much through affecting the intercept of the gravity equation, as through a change in the estimated distance-elasticity. However, the finding that today distance apparently restricts bilateral trade more than in earlier periods still constitutes a puzzle, since it suggests that, other things equal, distance-related trade barriers have become more important.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue, in line with the gravity approach, that the driving force behind globalization is not lower distance-barriers, but increased dispersion of economic mass around the globe. More recently, Buch et al (2004) argue against the notion of a distance-puzzle in that globalization may work as much through affecting the intercept of the gravity equation, as through a change in the estimated distance-elasticity. However, the finding that today distance apparently restricts bilateral trade more than in earlier periods still constitutes a puzzle, since it suggests that, other things equal, distance-related trade barriers have become more important.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Buch et al (2004), Carrère and Schiff (2005), Brun et al (2005), Boulhol and de Serres (2010), Lin and Sim (2012), Yotov (2012) Carrère et al (2013) and .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, scholars have been mostly bewildered by the fact that empirical estimation of 'distance coefficients' (measuring the effect of distance on trade) were practically constant over time [29]. In a widely cited book, Frances Cairncross [30], senior fellow at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles), proclaimed the 'death of distances' as a result of advancements in communication and transport technologies.…”
Section: The 'Distance Puzzle'mentioning
confidence: 99%