2010
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dissection of transcriptional modules regulated by various drugs of abuse in the mouse striatum

Abstract: The transcriptional response to six commonly-abused drugs was assessed in the mouse brain revealing common modules of drug-induced genes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
157
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
10
157
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we determine that srf and actin, which bear SRE sites in their promoter, are not regulated by an acute cocaine administration. Our demonstration of an involvement of Elk-1 activation in cocaine-induced SRE-driven gene regulations is strengthened by a recent whole-genome microarray profiling of drugs of abuse showing that one important cluster of upregulated genes is under the control of SRF/SRE regulatory sites (Piechota et al, 2010). Induction of this group of genes was strongly impaired by SL327 pretreatment, thus showing the involvement of ERK signaling in the instatement of a large group of genes in response to cocaine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Finally, we determine that srf and actin, which bear SRE sites in their promoter, are not regulated by an acute cocaine administration. Our demonstration of an involvement of Elk-1 activation in cocaine-induced SRE-driven gene regulations is strengthened by a recent whole-genome microarray profiling of drugs of abuse showing that one important cluster of upregulated genes is under the control of SRF/SRE regulatory sites (Piechota et al, 2010). Induction of this group of genes was strongly impaired by SL327 pretreatment, thus showing the involvement of ERK signaling in the instatement of a large group of genes in response to cocaine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The results of our analysis offer insights into the relationship between psychostimulant exposure and neuroinflammation. Piechota et al (2010) studied the time course of gene expression changes in the striatum of adult C57BL/6J mice following administration of a variety of drugs (nicotine, ethanol, cocaine, morphine, heroin, and methamphetamine), at 1, 2, 4, and 8 h after exposure. At 1 h after administration of cocaine (25 mg/kg), gene arrays showed statistically significant (p \ 0.01) increases in the following: hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), multiple transcription factors (EGR2, EGR3, EGR4), astrocyte growth factor/mitogen Amphiregulin (Areg), cytokine receptors (IL-6r, TNF-a), TLR13, and MMP16.…”
Section: Evidence Of a Neuroinflammatory Response In Psychostimulant mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asanuma et al (2004) provided an early report of microglial activation by relatively high dose amphetamine in mice (four treatments of 4 mg/kg at 2-h intervals). To add to an understanding of psychostimulantassociated changes in IIR gene expression, we performed post hoc analysis on the annotated datasets from three experiments (Piechota et al 2010;Renthal et al 2007;Ahmed et al 2005) which are available in the GEO public database. Using a two-tailed T test (p \ 0.01) within GEO, we compared the cocaine-and/or methamphetamine-treated animals to saline controls, searching for changes in expression of inflammatory-related transcripts in response to drug.…”
Section: Evidence Of a Neuroinflammatory Response In Psychostimulant mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression of hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (Hprt1 -Mm03024075_m1), which had a stable mRNA level, was quantified to control for variations in cDNA amounts. The usefulness of Hprt1 as a reference transcript was determined in our previous studies (Korostynski et al 2007;Piechota et al 2010).…”
Section: Contingent Versus Non-contingent Administration Of Chocolatementioning
confidence: 99%