2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-2110-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New operant model of reinstatement of food-seeking behavior in mice

Abstract: This study provides a new operant model in mice for the evaluation of food-taking behavior and reveals specific changes in the dopamine and opioid system associated to the behavioral responses directed to obtain a natural reward.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used a reliable operant model of reinstatement validated in our laboratory (Martin-Garcia et al, 2011;Soria et al, 2008) to demonstrate that the constitutive deletion of MOR, DOR, PENK, and PDYN differentially modifies the acquisition and reinstatement of cocaineseeking behavior, but has no significant consequences in a similar operant training for palatable food. Indeed, a similar performance in operant responding maintained by food was obtained in all knockout mice and wild-type littermates under our experimental conditions, which ruled out a potential learning impairment for operant training in these four lines of knockout mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have used a reliable operant model of reinstatement validated in our laboratory (Martin-Garcia et al, 2011;Soria et al, 2008) to demonstrate that the constitutive deletion of MOR, DOR, PENK, and PDYN differentially modifies the acquisition and reinstatement of cocaineseeking behavior, but has no significant consequences in a similar operant training for palatable food. Indeed, a similar performance in operant responding maintained by food was obtained in all knockout mice and wild-type littermates under our experimental conditions, which ruled out a potential learning impairment for operant training in these four lines of knockout mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…under fixed ratio 1 (FR1) (5 consecutive days) and FR3 (7 consecutive days). The criteria for acquisition of operant responding were achieved when mice maintained a stable responding with less than 20% deviation from the mean of the total number of infusions earned in three consecutive sessions, with at least 75% responding on the reinforced nose-poke, and a minimum of 10 reinforcements per session (Martin-Garcia et al, 2011;Soria et al, 2008). After the 12 FR sessions, animals were tested in a progressive ratio (PR) schedule where the response requirement to earn infusions escalated according to the following series: 1-2-3- 5-12-18-27-40-60-90-135-200-300-450-675-1000.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on an FR1 schedule over a time period of seven days. The criteria for acquisition of operant responding were achieved when mice maintained a stable responding with less than 25% deviation from the mean of the total number of infusions earned in three consecutive sessions, with at least 65% responding on the reinforced nose-poke, and a minimum of four reinforcements per session (Martin-Garcia et al, 2011; Soria et al, 2008). From days 8 to 15 (eight sessions), mice received their appropriate drug injection 60 min before each FR1 training session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some limitations to this approach do exist, such as unintended escaping of LED light acting as a behavioral cue during stimulation. 54,55 3 Devices…”
Section: Fiber Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%