2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale–Revised: An examination of a reduced-item version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
65
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
65
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…'Disgust sensitivity' (DS) can be defined as the degree to which the disgust response is unpleasant or distressing to an individual (van Overveld et al, 2006). This trait has been demonstrated as psychometrically separable from DP (Fergus & Valentiner, 2009), and has independent links with mental health problems (Olatunji, Cisler, Deacon, Connolly, & Lohr, 2007;van Overveld et al, 2006). For example, a study with people with emetophobia (fear of vomiting)…”
Section: Disgust Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Disgust sensitivity' (DS) can be defined as the degree to which the disgust response is unpleasant or distressing to an individual (van Overveld et al, 2006). This trait has been demonstrated as psychometrically separable from DP (Fergus & Valentiner, 2009), and has independent links with mental health problems (Olatunji, Cisler, Deacon, Connolly, & Lohr, 2007;van Overveld et al, 2006). For example, a study with people with emetophobia (fear of vomiting)…”
Section: Disgust Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, increased DS was correlated with heightened anxiety sensitivity that is present across the anxiety disorders, suggesting DS might be more general across anxiety disorders and less specific to C-OCD than previously thought. Goetz et al (2013) suggested that these findings have important clinical implications as it may be useful to refine treatment for individuals who are more prone to DP than DS, or vice versa, given that the constructs exhibit more unique rather than shared variance (Fergus & Valentiner, 2009). Consequently, Goetz and colleagues suggested that behavioural interventions that lead to extinction, such as exposure, could be employed with individuals scoring high in DP to reduce their heightened reaction to disgust-related stimuli.…”
Section: Disgust Sensitivity and Disgust Propensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised (DPSS-R; Fergus & Valentiner, 2009;van Overveld, De Jong, & Peters, 2010) is a 12-item self-report instrument, using a 5-point Likert scale (range, 12-60), measuring disgust propensity (e.g.,''I avoid disgusting things'') and disgust sensitivity (e.g.,''It scares me when I feel nauseous'') irrespective of particular disgust elicitors. Psychometric evaluation demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (a = .89 for propensity and a = .87 for sensitivity) (van Overveld et al, 2006) and predictive validity (van Overveld et al, 2010).…”
Section: Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-revisedmentioning
confidence: 99%