1920
DOI: 10.1177/003591572001301601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Discovery of the Intestinal Protozoa of Man.

Abstract: Under the title " A Letter of Mr. Anthony Leuwenhook (sic) dated from Delft, Nov. 4th. 1681. Containing an account of several new Discoveries made by him this last Summer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

1927
1927
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The earliest studies of the presence of gut microbes in humans, dated back to the late 17th century, were by the Dutch scientist Antony van Leeuwenhoek, who discovered gut microbiota in his excrement. With more advanced laboratory techniques, the importance of host-microbe interactions in the human holobiont is now progressively being uncovered (13). The human body is colonized by commensal microorganisms, predominately bacteria that have coevolved in symbiosis with their host.…”
Section: The Gut Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest studies of the presence of gut microbes in humans, dated back to the late 17th century, were by the Dutch scientist Antony van Leeuwenhoek, who discovered gut microbiota in his excrement. With more advanced laboratory techniques, the importance of host-microbe interactions in the human holobiont is now progressively being uncovered (13). The human body is colonized by commensal microorganisms, predominately bacteria that have coevolved in symbiosis with their host.…”
Section: The Gut Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that letter, van Leeuwenhoek described what he observed in his stool sample using his single lens microscope. Dobell (1920) concluded from van Leeuwenhoek's description that these were Giardia trophozoites (Ford, 2005), but there was no evidence that van Leeuwenhoek could as well as differences in virulence and pathogenicity of G. duodenalis isolates are recognised as important determinants for the severity of infection (Thompson et al, 1993;Buret, 1994;Homan and Mank, 2001). Their bodies were somewhat longer than broad, and their belly, which was fl attish, furnished with sundry little paws, wherewith they made such a stir in the clear medium and among the globules, that you might even fancy you saw a woodlouse running up against a wall; and albeit they made a quick motion with their paws, yet for all that they made but slow progress."…”
Section: Early Studies and Their Impact On Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of a PCR assay targeting the genes whip1 and whip2 has been a major step forward and is nowadays the test of choice, especially in symptomatic patients without typical histopathological findings in intestinal biopsies (sickleform particle-containing cells on periodic acid-Schiff (PAS-)stained biopsy specimens) [49]. [119], microscopic detection of protozoan cysts and trophozoites has been the most widely used diagnostic approach. On fresh stool samples, direct microscopy is performed by mixing a small amount of faeces with a physiological 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution.…”
Section: Tropheryma Whippleimentioning
confidence: 99%