or not a given mass really represents agglutinated organisms. The method should be particularly useful in those laboratories that are now subdividing the organisms of group IV into the various types, since the quantities of organisms and serums required are much smaller than for the macroscopic method.In practically all the preparations the organisms at the periphery tend to be crowded more closely together than in the remainder of the drop, and the inexpe¬ rienced eye is inclined at first to mistake such group¬ ings for true agglutination. One should take care, therefore, to examine the whole drop before reaching any conclusion as to whether or not agglutination has taken place.One other precaution that should be mentioned is that the type III organisms very often agglutinate in only one or two large clumps, which fall to the bottom of the drop and which, in this situation, may be over¬ looked. If one is not careful, one is likely to focus the attention on the few organisms remaining free in the upper part of the fluid and fail entirely to observe the big clumps at the bottom.Although this method has been applied extensively only to the pneumococcus, it should be found equally useful in other agglutination reactions. The strepto¬ cocci, for example, are stained well by this method, and even gram-negative bacteria take the stain, though with less intensity than do the gram-positive organisms.In three cases, two of which were of group IV and one of type III, it has been possible to obtain directly from the sputum sufficient organisms for typing by this method, without