2021
DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2020.1868419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dimensionality of early executive functions in young preschoolers: Comparing unidimensional versus bidimensional models and their ecological validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe it is important to dissociate performance in EF in its sub-constructs to better understand the effects of media use. Based on Hendry, Jones, and Charman (2016) conceptual framework and the recent evidence of 3–4 year being better modelled within a bidimensional structure of self-control and working-memory/cognitive flexibility ( Scionti & Marzocchi, 2021 ), and partly supported by the pattern of associations within our dataset, we created two composite measures of , one for working-memory/cognitive flexibility (which comprises both a cognitive flexibility measure and two working-memory measures) and another for impulse/self-control (which comprises both cool and hot inhibitory control).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe it is important to dissociate performance in EF in its sub-constructs to better understand the effects of media use. Based on Hendry, Jones, and Charman (2016) conceptual framework and the recent evidence of 3–4 year being better modelled within a bidimensional structure of self-control and working-memory/cognitive flexibility ( Scionti & Marzocchi, 2021 ), and partly supported by the pattern of associations within our dataset, we created two composite measures of , one for working-memory/cognitive flexibility (which comprises both a cognitive flexibility measure and two working-memory measures) and another for impulse/self-control (which comprises both cool and hot inhibitory control).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it relates to EF, two out of the four measures significantly predicted germ spreading behaviors, such that worse cognitive flexibility (DCCS) was associated with increased toy to mouth frequency and parent/teacher report of poor metacognition was associated with both increased toy to mouth and face touching frequency. Previous work supports a two-factor model of EF across preschool-aged children, where cognitive flexibility was differentiated from IC, but not WM ( Scionti & Marzocchi, 2021 ). The findings from our performance-based tasks suggest that impairment only in cognitive flexibility (but not IC) is associated with germ spreading behaviors, in terms of putting toys in one’s mouth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Three executive function domain scores (i.e., inhibition, working memory, and flexibility) were computed by averaging scores on relevant tasks. This decision was based on recent research suggesting that the structure of executive function in preschoolers is multidimensional (Scionti & Marzocchi, 2021), and in an attempt to explore whether NFPP targets different executive functions. As scores on the two delay tasks were not significantly correlated, they were not combined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%