2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10409-017-0747-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dimension split element-free Galerkin method for three-dimensional potential problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the number of planes in the direction x 1 should be large. In this numerical example, we choose the number of planes to be 30,35,40,45, and the corresponding results are shown in Figure 14. From the results, we can see that the results converge as the number of planes increase, and the DSRKPM has obvious advantages of computational efficiency.…”
Section: Figure 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the number of planes in the direction x 1 should be large. In this numerical example, we choose the number of planes to be 30,35,40,45, and the corresponding results are shown in Figure 14. From the results, we can see that the results converge as the number of planes increase, and the DSRKPM has obvious advantages of computational efficiency.…”
Section: Figure 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Cheng et al combined the DSM with improved complex variable EFG method to solve 3D potential problems, 36 wave propagation problems, 37 3D transient heat conduction problems, 38 and advection-diffusion problems. 39 Meng et al combined the DSM with IEFG method to solve 3D potential problems, 40 wave propagation problems, 41 and transient heat conduction problems. 42 In this paper, introducing the DSM into the RKPM, a new method that is the DSRKPM for 3D potential problems is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical calculations are widely used in scientific research and engineering applications [23][24][25], which can realize optimal design and high-precision analysis of structures. A new and effective numerical method developed in recent years is the meshless method, including diffuse element method [26], smoothed particle method [27], reproducing kernel particle method [28][29][30][31], elementfree Galerkin method [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], finite point method [42], natural element method [43], radial basis function method [44], mesh-free kp-Ritz method [45], complex variable meshless method [46][47][48], and all kinds of meshless boundary integral equation method [49][50][51]. In addition, numerical methods also include weighted residual method, finite difference method, finite element method, and boundary element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining the dimension splitting method and meshless methods, the hybrid complex variable EFG method [27][28][29][30][31], the dimension split EFG method [32][33][34][35], and the dimension splitting reproducing kernel particle method [36] for 3D problems are proposed, respectively, and those new methods can improve the computational speed of traditional meshless methods for solving 3D problems greatly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%