The Digital Spatial Fix

Abstract

This article brings distinct strands of the political economy of communication and economic geography together in order to theorise the role digital technologies play in Marxian crisis theory. Capitalist advances into digital spaces do not make the law of value obsolete, but these spaces do offer new methods for displacing overaccumulated capital, increasing consumption, or accumulating new, cheaper labour. We build on David Harvey's theory of the spatial fix to describe three digital spatial fixes, fixed capital projects that use the specific properties of digital spaces to increase the rate of profit, before themselves becoming obstacles to the addictive cycle of accumulation: the primitive accumulation of time in the social Web, the annihilation of time by space in high-frequency trading, and affect rent in virtual worlds. We conclude by reflecting on how these digital spatial fixes also fix the tempo of accumulation and adjust the time-scale of Marxian crisis theory.

Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject

“…More helpful are approaches which see what is going on with data as a form of fundamental appropriation (Greene and Joseph 2015; Thatcher et al 2016, drawing on Harvey 2004) or extraction (Mezzadra and Neilson 2017) of resources. This appropriation is certainly complex.…”

Gaming the gift: The affective economy of League of Legends ‘fair’ free-to-play model

“…The extreme size of Tencent Holdings Limited as one of the largest games and Internet conglomerates in the world is significant here as it is this political economic formation that is continuously seeking to control and extract exchange value from LoL’s affective network of co-creative relations. Paralleling the exchange value generated by social media platforms across the Internet (Arvidsson and Colleoni, 2012; Nieborg, 2015; Van Dijck, 2013; Greene and Joseph, 2015), the microtransactions of online games offer another rich example of what many Internet scholars have described as affective economies. The critical frame of affective economies provides a useful way to analyse the gift like status of ‘fair’ F2P as it positions digital games alongside related examples of monetisation from Internet and fan studies.…”

To see and be seen, to know and be known: Perceptions and prevention strategies on Facebook surveillance

“…Marichal (2012) states yet that it is a ‘structured decision’ made in accordance with Facebook’s economic interests. If we consider that Facebook is a capitalist organization, we had better understand the ideology that is behind the creation of the ‘architecture of disclosure’: Facebook’s big income sources are selling data and renting platform space for propaganda (Fuchs, 2011, 2012; Dal Bello, 2011; Fuchs and Sevignani, 2013; Netchitailova, 2012, 2014; Greene and Joseph, 2015).…”