2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1575892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diffusion of Pay for Performance Across Occupations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, international research has found that human resource practices that threaten or support those needs—thus creating the pressures leading to the curvilinear performance–turnover relationship—exist in a wide range of countries. Pay-for performance systems, which reward the top and penalize the bottom, have been studied in culturally divergent countries, such as China (Buck, Liu, & Skovoroda, 2008; Du & Choi, 2010), India (Kingdon & Teal, 2007), Italy (Origo, 2009), Japan (Beatty, McCune, & Beatty, 1988; Hatvany & Pucik, 1981), Rwanda (Kalk, Paul, & Grabosch, 2010), and Spain (Bayo-Moriones, Galdon-Sanchez, & Martinez-de-Morentin, 2010). The spread of U.S.-based multinational corporations has also brought pay-for-performance norms around the world, as at the corporation studied by DeVoe and Iyengar (2004) that used the system in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Philippines, Taiwan, and the United States.…”
Section: Generalizability and Variability Of Performance–turnover Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, international research has found that human resource practices that threaten or support those needs—thus creating the pressures leading to the curvilinear performance–turnover relationship—exist in a wide range of countries. Pay-for performance systems, which reward the top and penalize the bottom, have been studied in culturally divergent countries, such as China (Buck, Liu, & Skovoroda, 2008; Du & Choi, 2010), India (Kingdon & Teal, 2007), Italy (Origo, 2009), Japan (Beatty, McCune, & Beatty, 1988; Hatvany & Pucik, 1981), Rwanda (Kalk, Paul, & Grabosch, 2010), and Spain (Bayo-Moriones, Galdon-Sanchez, & Martinez-de-Morentin, 2010). The spread of U.S.-based multinational corporations has also brought pay-for-performance norms around the world, as at the corporation studied by DeVoe and Iyengar (2004) that used the system in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Philippines, Taiwan, and the United States.…”
Section: Generalizability and Variability Of Performance–turnover Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%