2012
DOI: 10.3386/w17743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diffusion of Microfinance

Abstract: Abstract. We examine how participation in a microfinance program diffuses through social networks, using detailed demographic, social network, and participation data from 43 villages in South India. We exploit exogenous variation in the importance (in a network sense) of the people who were first informed about the program, the "injection points." Microfinance participation is significantly higher when the injection points have higher eigenvector centrality. We also estimate structural models of diffusion that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
669
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(687 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
15
669
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The different perspectives on human needs-and especially the weaknesses of Maslow's hierarchy of needs as well as the relationship between Nussbaum and Sen's capabilities and Doyal and Gough's basic needs-have also been lucidly presented by Laurie Michaelis in the context of the ethics of consumption (Michaelis 2000). 28 With regard to social connection, shared responsibility, and networks, as well as with an eye to the aforementioned capability approach (see also Kuklys 2005;Robeyns 2005;and Sen 1999), 29 we can now take up the concept of power 26 See also Banerjee et al (2013) on the diffusion of information on and participation in microfinance in Indian villages and the respective importance of centralities of leaders (in this case especially eigenvector centrality; see also Banerjee et al 2012). 27 Nevertheless, despite all criticism (see, for instance, Zimbardo et al 2012, p. 372 et seq.…”
Section: With Power Comes Responsibility?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different perspectives on human needs-and especially the weaknesses of Maslow's hierarchy of needs as well as the relationship between Nussbaum and Sen's capabilities and Doyal and Gough's basic needs-have also been lucidly presented by Laurie Michaelis in the context of the ethics of consumption (Michaelis 2000). 28 With regard to social connection, shared responsibility, and networks, as well as with an eye to the aforementioned capability approach (see also Kuklys 2005;Robeyns 2005;and Sen 1999), 29 we can now take up the concept of power 26 See also Banerjee et al (2013) on the diffusion of information on and participation in microfinance in Indian villages and the respective importance of centralities of leaders (in this case especially eigenvector centrality; see also Banerjee et al 2012). 27 Nevertheless, despite all criticism (see, for instance, Zimbardo et al 2012, p. 372 et seq.…”
Section: With Power Comes Responsibility?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the tendency of individuals with many connection to make new friends easily and to have friends with many connections. Due to higher connectedness, information is more likely to reach the central individuals, and they are typically better positioned to influence others (see e.g., Kitsak et al 2010;Banerjee et al 2013;Contractor and DeChurch 2014).…”
Section: Centrality and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further analyze H1 at the household-level, I will follow Banerjee et al (2012), in their the reduced-form specification, by using measures of network centrality in a linear specification of the following form: 11…”
Section: Linear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Banerjee et al (2012) use the eigenvector centrality in their study of microfinance diffusion in Indian villages, and show that their results are different if degree centrality is used instead. This is the case given their data are for (subsamples) of networks with many more nodes than the network data from Gambian villages.…”
Section: Linear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation