2013
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2013.799716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differential effects of PNF versus passive stretch conditioning on neuromuscular performance

Abstract: The effects of flexibility conditioning on neuromuscular and sensorimotor performance were assessed near to full knee extension (25°). Eighteen males who were randomly assigned into two groups underwent eight weeks (three-times per week) of flexibility conditioning (hip region/knee flexor musculature; dominant limb) involving either proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) (n=9) or passive stretching (PASS) (n=9). Both modes of flexibility conditioning are popular within contemporary exercise and clinic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A 6 weeks (5 days a week x 30s) PNF stretching training also didn't cause a change on passive resistive torque (Konrad, Gad & Tilp 2015). Minshull et al (2014) also received similar results in his study in which similar protocols used (8 weeks, 3 days a week) Higgs and Winter (2009) could not find any evidence showing that PNF training (4 weeks, 3 times a week) is harmful to isokinetic torque generation. This study indicated that increasing flexibility does not have a negative effect on isokinetic torque.…”
Section: Null Effects Of Pnf Stretching On Athletic Performancesupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 6 weeks (5 days a week x 30s) PNF stretching training also didn't cause a change on passive resistive torque (Konrad, Gad & Tilp 2015). Minshull et al (2014) also received similar results in his study in which similar protocols used (8 weeks, 3 days a week) Higgs and Winter (2009) could not find any evidence showing that PNF training (4 weeks, 3 times a week) is harmful to isokinetic torque generation. This study indicated that increasing flexibility does not have a negative effect on isokinetic torque.…”
Section: Null Effects Of Pnf Stretching On Athletic Performancesupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Acute effects were studied in 4 of these studies and chronic effects in 4 of them. There were positive effects in 2 of the studies (Handel et al 1997, Rees et al 2007, null effect in 6 of them (Young & Elliott 2001, Manoel et al 2008, Place et al 2013, Reis et al 2013, Minshull et al 2014, Konrad, Gad & Tilp 2015, (Table 2). …”
Section: Effects On Isometric Contractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies used an isometric hamstring contraction for the contract-relax PNF. [6][7][8][9] In contrast the fifth study Davis et al, 5 had the subject contract their quadriceps instead of the hamstrings, however the remainder of their stretching protocol stayed consistent to the other studies. For static stretching, 2 studies 5,6 directed their subjects to perform unassisted static stretching while other studies completed the static stretching protocol with the assistance of a clinician.…”
Section: Implications Practice Education and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…The study by Kerrigan, et al used four sets of 30-second stretches, whilst the stretching maneuver in this study was held for 20 s. Therefore, further study with more vigorous stretching techniques is required. Although exploring the effects of passive stretching techniques might be also helpful [21], the reliability of measuring methods stretching method to improve hip extension and control lumbopelvic movements of patients with non-specific low back pain, which is exacerbated by extension-related activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%