2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'The difference in determinants of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium in a sample of young Australian women.'

Abstract: Background: Differences in the determinants of Chlamydia trachomatis ('chlamydia') and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) genital infection in women are not well understood.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
1
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(61 reference statements)
8
49
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual PPVs for significant pathogens were low and NPVs were high, reflecting the low population STI prevalence, in keeping with other prevalence reports in similar populations 23. These values would increase with higher STI prevalence and more highly triaged situations, but might be lower in community settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Individual PPVs for significant pathogens were low and NPVs were high, reflecting the low population STI prevalence, in keeping with other prevalence reports in similar populations 23. These values would increase with higher STI prevalence and more highly triaged situations, but might be lower in community settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As a positive control and for calculation of percent cytotoxicity, an equal number of cells were detergent lysed to determine the maximum releasable LDH. of it is standardized in any relevant way to host cells in vivo (3,5,32). Moreover, previous studies did not attempt to assess the relationship of organism burden to the host inflammatory response.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. genitalium er vanskeligere å påvise enn C. trachomatis, da bakteriemengden ofte er lav. Ekstraksjonsmetoden for bakterie-DNA er derfor en kritisk faktor (24,25). Viktigheten av metodevalg demonstreres i en studie der man sammenlignet tre ulike metoder for ekstraksjon av C. trachomatis-DNA og andelen positive funn varierte fra 4,3 % til 7,7 % (26).…”
Section: Diskusjonunclassified
“…Det er ikke funnet noen sammenheng mellom bakteriemengde og sykdom. Det viser seg at få bakterier også kan forårsake sykdom, og deteksjon av svake positive prøver er derfor av betydning (24). Vektlegging av denne problemstillingen har medført metodeforbedringer ved vårt laboratorium.…”
Section: Diskusjonunclassified