2014
DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v35i2.2532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Competitions

Abstract: The diagnostic competition (DX) provides a set of diagnostic benchmarks to evaluate diagnostic algorithms. This paper describes a common diagnostic framework used to evaluate diagnostic algorithms. This competition, started in 2009, has significantly helped shape diagnostic algorithms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some approaches exploit a truth maintenance system [15], others exploit fault probabilities to guide the process [16] (in the case of recommendation, this approach would exploit probability estimates for the items to be recommended); others are based on the pre-compilation of guiding heuristics [12], and still others exploit OBDD [49]. All of them show that diagnoses can be effectively computed and indeed the community established a competition for the design of efficient diagnosers (see [19]).…”
Section: Complexity and Efficient Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some approaches exploit a truth maintenance system [15], others exploit fault probabilities to guide the process [16] (in the case of recommendation, this approach would exploit probability estimates for the items to be recommended); others are based on the pre-compilation of guiding heuristics [12], and still others exploit OBDD [49]. All of them show that diagnoses can be effectively computed and indeed the community established a competition for the design of efficient diagnosers (see [19]).…”
Section: Complexity and Efficient Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term predictive accuracy is dependent on the respective PHM task and is evaluated by different metrics, some of which are subject-specific. Typical examples of these metrics are for fault detection fault detection rate, for diagnosis isolation classification rate, for health assessment root mean squared error, and for prognosis prognostic horizon (Saxena et al, 2010;Feldman et al, 2010;Gao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%