2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.icl.0000140907.45705.e2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnosis and Characteristics of Moderate Dry Eye in Non-Contact Lens Wearers

Abstract: A unique scoring system-based dry eye questionnaire was validated to separate non-contact lens wearers with moderate dry eye from healthy subjects. Objective tests of tear osmolality and stability and ocular surface integrity were better than other clinical measures at identifying differences between the two subject groups. The results strongly support the evidence that the diagnosis and treatment of moderate dry eye requires a detailed assessment of self-perceived symptoms and that objective clinical testing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in accordance with current literature, where the poor relationships between ocular signs and dry eye symptoms are criticised. [8][9][10][11]19 However, the use of a composite index might have shown a stronger relationship between staining and dry eye severity, as reported by Sullivan et al 63 The classic tests TMH, NIBUT, and PRTT, as well as the new LIPCOF (nasal and temporal) and LWE tests were significant correlated to dry eye symptoms (Table 2), although these correlations varied in their strengths. The relationship between LWE and dry eye symptoms investigated in this study confirms the findings of Korb et al, 15 where LWE was reported to correlate to symptoms as determined by the total Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in accordance with current literature, where the poor relationships between ocular signs and dry eye symptoms are criticised. [8][9][10][11]19 However, the use of a composite index might have shown a stronger relationship between staining and dry eye severity, as reported by Sullivan et al 63 The classic tests TMH, NIBUT, and PRTT, as well as the new LIPCOF (nasal and temporal) and LWE tests were significant correlated to dry eye symptoms (Table 2), although these correlations varied in their strengths. The relationship between LWE and dry eye symptoms investigated in this study confirms the findings of Korb et al, 15 where LWE was reported to correlate to symptoms as determined by the total Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…6,7 Correlations between these symptoms and individual clinical dry eye tests, like meibomian gland assessment, tear meniscus height (TMH) measurement, tear break-up time, phenol red thread test, Schirmer test, ocular staining, and ocular hyperaemia, are frequently poor. [8][9][10][11] A combination of tests might improve analysis of dry eye, 9,[12][13][14] but there is no agreement on which combination provides the best results. 11,12 New clinical tests, such as lid-wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) 15 and lidparallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF), 13,[16][17][18][19] show promising predictive ability for dry eye.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,23,24 The Texas Eye Research and Technology Center DEQ is a 33-item questionnaire based on the original dry eye questionnaire that adds several components to the original dry eye questionnaire, including 2 questions on the disease effect on QOL. 12,25 The questionnaire has undergone some validity testing and can discriminate between normal patients and patients with moderate dry eyes. Limitations of the questionnaire for measuring QOL in patients with dry eyes include the need for further test–retest reliability testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, only a small portion of the questionnaire is dedicated to QOL measures. 25 Thus, these 3 questionnaires are fairly limited in their ability to assess the effect of DED on QOL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 While it is accepted that fluorescein staining indicates some level of compromise to the ocular surface epithelia, there continues to be much debate regarding the underlying etiology for the staining. Studies have suggested that loss of tight junction integrity allows deeper penetration and pooling of fluorescein between cells or that the dye is staining dead or damaged cells.…”
Section: Dry Eye Ocular Surface Inflammation and Corneal Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%