1987
DOI: 10.1159/000284480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Development of the Concept of Reactive Psychoses

Abstract: Although reactive (psychogenic) psychoses have no doubt occurred throughout the history of mankind, it is only during the last century that the corresponding concept has been defined, beginning with Summer’s definition of the term ‘psychogenic’ and Jaspers’ distinctions between ‘reaction’ and ‘process’, and between ‘neurosis’ and ‘psychosis’, respectively. A change in Kurt Schneider’s nosological concepts induced the majority of German-speaking psychiatrists to avoid the concept of psychogenic psychoses. The v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
28
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also compatible with the Scandinavian tradition. In contrast to K. Schneider [2], the Scandinavian concept of schizophrenia, often referred to as 'nuclear schizophrenia' or 'process schizophrenia' [31], is narrower because it usually considers schizophrenia as a chronic disorder, separate from reactive psychoses [4,32].…”
Section: Impact Of Negative Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also compatible with the Scandinavian tradition. In contrast to K. Schneider [2], the Scandinavian concept of schizophrenia, often referred to as 'nuclear schizophrenia' or 'process schizophrenia' [31], is narrower because it usually considers schizophrenia as a chronic disorder, separate from reactive psychoses [4,32].…”
Section: Impact Of Negative Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, K. Schneider's [2] dichotomous classification was criticised for example by Strömgren [3] because K. Schneider [2] did not mention the concept of reactive psychoses, which was seen as an own entity separated from schizophrenia. Strömgren [4] claimed that these psychoses should be separated strictly from schizophrenia because there are great differences between them, not only with regard to the clinical picture but also prognosis and required treatment. In contrast to schizophrenia, reactive psychoses are usually not associated with a chronic course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 'paranoia', Kraepelin's term for psychoses with mere delusional symptoms, was also associated with an unfavourable course. However, based on the experience that some cases with prominent psychotic symptoms typical for 'dementia praecox' are associated with a favourable course typical for 'manic-depressive insanity', Kraepelin's classification was expanded by concepts such as 'schizoaffective psychosis' [3], 'schizophreniform psychosis' [4], 'cycloid psychosis' [5,6] or 'reactive psychosis' [7,8]. In spite of several differences, all these diverse concepts aimed at the delimitation of benign psychotic disturbances with a remitting course from chronic schizophrenic disorders [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition, at the extreme psychotic boundary of the bipolar spectrum, continues to challenge nosologists [38]. It overlaps with the French concept of 'bouffée délirante' [39] and the Scandinavian rubric of 'reactive psychosis' [40][41][42][43][44]. The newly proposed DSM-11I-R criteria [37] divide it into bipolar and de pressive subtypes.…”
Section: Episodic Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%