The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2003.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: disentangling the role of the subsidiary’s business network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsidiary relational embeddedness to external actors has been shown to drive knowledge creation and performance (Hakanson & Nobel, 2001;Schmid & Schurig, 2003;Almeida & Phene, 2004;Holm, Holmström & Sharma, 2005;Boehe, 2007;Mu, Gnyawali & Hatfield, 2007;Luo, 2001;Andersson et al, 2002). This is based on the reasoning that knowledge and capability development is facilitated through strong, trustful ties of mutual commitment that are able to transfer more fine-grained knowledge and information (Uzzi, 1996;Gulati, 1998).…”
Section: External Network Embeddednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsidiary relational embeddedness to external actors has been shown to drive knowledge creation and performance (Hakanson & Nobel, 2001;Schmid & Schurig, 2003;Almeida & Phene, 2004;Holm, Holmström & Sharma, 2005;Boehe, 2007;Mu, Gnyawali & Hatfield, 2007;Luo, 2001;Andersson et al, 2002). This is based on the reasoning that knowledge and capability development is facilitated through strong, trustful ties of mutual commitment that are able to transfer more fine-grained knowledge and information (Uzzi, 1996;Gulati, 1998).…”
Section: External Network Embeddednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a few exceptions (Perez and Sanchez, 2002;Tavares and Young, 2006;Williams, 2005), direct investigation of the role of strategic decision-making autonomy for the development of domestic sourcing has not been a preoccupation of the literature. However, positive relationships have been found between factors that are connected to strategic decision-making autonomy and the capacity to exploit locally available assets (Andersson and Forsgren, 2000;Birkinshaw and Hood, 1998;Pearce, 1999;Schmid and Schurig, 2003). This literature suggests that strategic decision-making autonomy leads to lower costs of conducting interorganisational transactions because of the shorter chain of command, the building up of trust between network partners, and the ability to innovate in relationships with domestic suppliers (see figure 1).…”
Section: Strategic Decision-making Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network relationships that the subsidiary has with business and non-business actors within and outside the multinational network has been linked to increased performance, knowledge flows and regional development among others (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989;Rugman & Verbeke, 2001;Schmid & Schurig, 2003;Forsgren et al, 2005;Ambos & Ambos, 2009). The concepts of decision making autonomy has been emphasised in particular after the shift away in the literature from more headquarter centred perspectives towards the focus on subsidiaries and their individual contribution (Edwards et al, 2002;Verbeke & Yuan, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%