The determination of distal hip circumference in universities students depending on the sport type

Karatieieva, S. Yu.; Слободян, О. М.; Lukashiv, T. O.; Honchar, Halyna; Komar, Wołodymyr; КОЗЛОВСЬКА, Світлана

doi:10.34142/hsr.2022.08.03.02

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the means of studying an athlete's state of health is the assessment of anthropometric parameters with the determination of overall and component indicators. In addition, these standards require periodic renewal due to acceleration processes occurring in society, especially among future athletes [9][10][11][12].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Establishing of Upper Extremities Length of Students of Higher Education Institutions of Bukovyna Depending on the Sport Type

Karatieieva¹,

Слободян²,

Slobodian³

et al. 2022

Ukr. ž. med. bìol. sportu

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to establish of upper limbs length of students of higher educational institutions of Bukovyna depending on the sport type with the further construction of forecasting model. Materials and methods. The research was conducted on 132 students of the first and second years of higher education institutions of Bukovyna aged from16 to 18. Of them, 86 (65.15%) were boys and 46 (34.85%) girls. The main group consisted of 92 (69.70%) students and the control group – 40 (30.30%) students. Among the students of the main group, there are 65 (70.65%) boys and 27 (29.35%) girls. The control group consisted of 21 (52.5%) boys and 19 (47.5%) girls. Students of the main group were engaged in the following sport types: football, volleyball, handball, basketball. Students of the control group did not additionally do sports, except for hours of physical education, in accordance with the curriculum. All students were subjected to an anthropometric study according to the method of V. V. Bunak modified by P. P. Shaparenkо. Anthropometric examination included determination of total and partial parameters. Results and discussion. According to the results of the study, that included the distribution of the length of the right and left upper limbs for gender, there was a significant difference in the average length of young boys and young girls in the main group. This is also evidenced by Welch's t-test: t (49.3) = – 7.253, p < 0.05. The result of the distribution of the length of the right and left upper limbs in the control group for gender also indicates that there was a significant difference in the length of the upper limb of young boys and young girls of the control group on average. This was also confirmed by Welch's t-test: t (25.971) = – 5.670, p < 0.05 (right upper extremity) and t (26.175) = – 5.754, p < 0.05 (left upper extremity). Taking into account the results of the distribution of the lengths of the upper limbs depending on the sport type, it shows that there was a significant difference in the average value of the length depending on the sport type. Since p = 0.25 < 0.05, the difference between the medians of the groups is statistically significant. When comparing the lengths of both upper limbs of the studied young boys and young girls, no significant difference in the average length of the right and left upper limbs was found t (255.92) = – 0.172, p = 0.864. Conclusion. By comparing the length of the right and left upper limbs of the studied students of the main group, depending on the sport type, there was a significant difference in the average value (football players have the smallest length of the upper limbs: right – 69.77 ± 2.0 cm, of them 70.39 ± 2.00 cm in young boys and 67.90 ± 2.00 cm in young girls, left – 70.28 ± 2.0 cm, of them 71.41 ± 2.00 cm in young boys and 68.72 ± 2.00 cm in young girls, while volleyball players have the largest: right – 76.20 ± 2.0 cm, of them 77.32 ± 2.00 cm in young boys and 74.22 ± 2.00 cm in young girls, and left – 77.00 ± 2.0 cm, of them 78.43 ± 2.00 cm in young boys and 75.92 ± 2.00 cm in young girls). A significant factor for the length of both upper limbs is height. A model for predicting the length of the upper limbs was derived: y = 0.422 * x, (where y – the length of the right upper limb, x – height)

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Establishing of Upper Extremities Length of Students of Higher Education Institutions of Bukovyna Depending on the Sport Type

Karatieieva¹,

Слободян²,

Slobodian³

et al. 2022

Ukr. ž. med. bìol. sportu

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Антропометричні особливості юних спортсменів під час відбору так само залежать від етапів підготовки [10,11,12]. Розглядаючи основи індивідуалізації підготовки спортсмена, більшість дослідників і спеціалістів надають особливого значення вивченню змін організму, які мають кількісний і якісний характер, визначати неоднакові типи пропорцій і конституцій тіла у представників різних видів спорту, вважаючи, що силові можливості спортсменів значно залежать від індивідуальних морфологічних здібностей [13].…”

Section: вступunclassified

Model for Predicting Changes in Thigh Circumference Changes in the Lower Third Over Time in Students From Bukovyna Higher Educational Institutions Based on Sport Type

Karatieieva

2023

Act. Probl. of the Modern Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dynamic comparison of thigh circumference in the lower third was conducted in 132 students of Bukovyna (the initial study was carried out during September-October 2021, and a repeat study of these same students in September-October 2022). All students in the main group, aside from their program-specific physical activities, participated in the following sports over the year: 46 (50.00%) students played football, including 38 (41.30%) boys and 8 (8.70%) girls; 19 (20.65%) students played volleyball, including 10 (10.86%) boys and 9 (9.78%) girls; 14 (22.58%) students played handball, including 8 (8.69%) boys and 6 (6.52%) girls; 13 (14.13%) students played basketball, including 9 (9.78%) boys and 4 (4.34%) girls. Students in the control group had physical education classes according to their program requirements but did not engage in additional sports activities. All students underwent an anthropometric assessment, specifically the measurement of thigh circumference in the lower third following the method of P.P. Shaparenka. A paired t-test was employed to compare the students' measurements between the initial assessment and a follow-up one year later. The collected data were statistically analyzed using the licensed program RStudio. Comparing the changes in thigh circumference in the lower third between the main and control groups, it was found that students in the main group who participated in various sports had higher measurements than those in the control group, with an average difference of ±4.40 cm. Comparing the right and left thigh circumferences in the main group demonstrated that the right thigh had a larger circumference (right: 49.26±5.60 cm, left: 45.88±5.45 cm). The comparison of thigh circumference changes over the year showed a noticeable increase in thigh girth in the middle third in 2022 compared to 2021 (right: ±1.27 cm, left: ±2.84 cm). Hence, the predictive model for right thigh circumference (Cdr) in the lower third can be represented as follows: Cdr = β1 + β2 + 0.418w, where Cdr stands for right thigh circumference in the lower third, w denotes weight, β1 values are 25.560 for young girls and 20.165 for young boys, and β2 values are -4.497 for the control group, 0.039 for the football group, 0.039 for the handball group, and 0.502 for the volleyball group. Similarly, the predictive model for left thigh circumference in the lower third (Cdl) is expressed as: Cdl = β1 + β2 + 0.387w, where Cdl represents left thigh circumference in the lower third, w denotes weight, β1 values are 24.638 for young girls and 18.523 for young boys, and β2 values are -0.051 for the control group, 0.379 for the football group, -0.291 for the handball group, and 0.323 for the volleyball group. Gender, sport type, and weight serve as significant predictors for predicting thigh circumference in the lower third.

show abstract

“…This is due to the manifestation of the general trend and objectification of the system of training athletes, the implementation of achievements of scientific and technical progress, the use of opportunities of general scientific disciplines, such as cybernetics, morphometry, system approach, operations research, etc., and the search for reserves for improving the system of training athletes. In this regard, the formation of a complete system of knowledge requires consideration of management and control, selection and orientation, modeling and forecasting, as one of the key directions in the process of studying the theory of training athletes [10][11][12][13][14]. So, in our opinion, the study of anatomical parameters of the femoral area for the purpose of sports selection of promising athletes to achieve high results is extremely relevant and requires further research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anatomical Characteristics of the Thigh Parameters the Students of Bukovyna

Karatieieva

2024

Scientific and practical journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is known that the factor that determines success in sports is the morphological features of the structure of the human body. In order to establish the anatomical characteristics of the thigh parameters of students of Bukovyna who play football and handball, followed by modeling for sports selection, a study was conducted of students of higher educational institutions of Bukovyna (n=129), of which young boys - n=69 and young girls - n=60. The subjects were divided into a main group - 89 students who improved by playing football and handball and a control group - 40 students who did not do the sports. Students of the main group, in addition to the physical activity that was included in the program of their specialty during the year, additionally attended sports sections in football and handball during the year. Medium-intensity training took place under the control of a trainer, the frequency of training was 3.43 ± 1.26 days/week (90 minutes each). Students of the control group did not do the sports. The initial survey was conducted in 2021 year, and the same students were resurveyed in 2022 year. All subjects were subjected to an anthropometric study, according to the method of P.P. Shaparenka (thigh circumference in the upper third, in the middle third and in the lower third, body weight, height). So, it was found that when comparing the first and second measurement, the thigh circumference indicators at the second measurement (in dynamics after one year) were slightly higher in students who play football (young boys and young girls) in the upper, middle and lower thirds than in students who play handball (for students who play football ±3.43 cm, for students who play handball ±2.12 cm). The model for predicting the circumference of the thigh in the upper third on the right: Cpr=β1 + β2 + 0.493w – 0.135h, where Cpr is the circumference of the thigh in the upper third (right), w is body weight, h is height, β1= (49.735 for girls and 44.489 for young men), β2= (–1.391 for the soccer group; –2.321 for the handball group), on the left: Cpl=β1 + β2 + 0.465w, where Cpl is the circumference of the thigh in the upper third (left), w is body weight, β1= ( 25.736 for girls and 20.147 for boys), β2= (–1.333 for the football group; –0.515 for the handball group). The model for predicting the circumference of the thigh in the middle of the right: Cmr=β1 + β2 + 0.460w – 0.183h, where Cmr is the circumference of the thigh in the middle of the right, w is body weight, h is height; β1= (52.567 for young girls and 48.930 for young boys), β2= (–2.235 for the football group; –1.968 for the handball group); on the left: Cml=β1 + β2 + 0.449w, where Cml is the thigh circumference in the middle of the left, w is body weight; β1= (20.716 for young girls and 20.943 for young boys), β2= (– 0.254 for the football group; –1.405 for the handball group). The model for predicting the circumference of the thigh in the lower third of the right: Cdr=β1 + β2 + 0.418w, where Cdr is the circumference of the thigh in the lower third of the right, w is body weight, β1= (25.560 for young girls and 20.165 for young boys), β2= (– 0.039 for the football group; 0.061 for the handball group); on the left: Cdl=β1 + β2 + 0.387w, where Cdl is the thigh circumference in the lower third on the left, w is body weight; β1= (24.638 for young girls and 18.523 for young boys), β2= (– 0.379 for the football group; –0.261 for the handball group). So, it is established that for significant predictors for predicting thigh circumference on the right in the upper and middle third are gender, sport, height and body weight, in the lower third are gender, sport and body weight, on the left are gender, sport and body weight.

show abstract

The determination of distal hip circumference in universities students depending on the sport type

Cited by 11 publications

References 18 publications

Establishing of Upper Extremities Length of Students of Higher Education Institutions of Bukovyna Depending on the Sport Type

Establishing of Upper Extremities Length of Students of Higher Education Institutions of Bukovyna Depending on the Sport Type

Model for Predicting Changes in Thigh Circumference Changes in the Lower Third Over Time in Students From Bukovyna Higher Educational Institutions Based on Sport Type

Anatomical Characteristics of the Thigh Parameters the Students of Bukovyna

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About