2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00219.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determinants of the price impact of block trades: further evidence

Abstract: This article extends previous literature which examines the determinants of the price impact of block trades on the Australian Stock Exchange. As previous literature suggests that liquidity exhibits intraday patterns, we introduce time of day dummy variables to explore time dependencies in price impact. Following theoretical developments in previous literature, the explanatory power of the bid-ask spread, a lagged cumulative stock return variable and a refined measure of market returns are also examined. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
11
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time dummies coefficients for all types of spreads quoted, relative and effective report similar patterns of a positive coefficients for time dummy1 at 0.2, 0.0004, and 0.015 ,respectively, then followed be negative signs reported in the same order for timedummy2 at (-0.03),(-0.0005) and(-0.034). Our time of the day results are consistent with Frino et al(2007) who find liquidity cost or price impact is the largest for of block trades executed at the first hour. Moreover, our intraday spread pattern is somehow similar to Al-Suhaibani and Kryzanowski (2000) who find that spreads are at their highest at the open and narrow over the trading day in the SSM.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The time dummies coefficients for all types of spreads quoted, relative and effective report similar patterns of a positive coefficients for time dummy1 at 0.2, 0.0004, and 0.015 ,respectively, then followed be negative signs reported in the same order for timedummy2 at (-0.03),(-0.0005) and(-0.034). Our time of the day results are consistent with Frino et al(2007) who find liquidity cost or price impact is the largest for of block trades executed at the first hour. Moreover, our intraday spread pattern is somehow similar to Al-Suhaibani and Kryzanowski (2000) who find that spreads are at their highest at the open and narrow over the trading day in the SSM.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Volatility shows positive coefficient for the buy block trades and negative for sell trades which confirm the greater price impact that is attributed to higher risk and dispersion of beliefs among traders. The volatility coefficients are consistent with prior research (e.g., Chan and Lakonishok, 1997; Chiyachantana et al, 2004;Frino et al, 2007) Turnover has negative relationship to price impact for the buy blocks, indicating that increased liquidity in the market reduces the price impact of the block trade. Our results confirm prior market research that turnover as a measure of liquidity should have negative relationship with the price impact.…”
Section: Trade Sign Effectsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that the market has learnt something new about the instrument, which leads to a new price equilibrium. In this study, we follow Mayers (1990), Gemmill (1996), Frino, Jarnecic, and Lepone (2007) and Alzahrani, Gregoriou, and Hudson (2013) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, given that Alzahrani, Gregoriou, and Hudson (2013) and Frino, Jarnecic, and Lepone (2007) report intraday effects for block trades for consistency, we introduce trading hour, day of week and month of year dummy variables in equations (5) and (7) in order to capture trading time/period effects. The results which can be seen in Table 3 …”
Section: [Insert Table 2 Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%