The Determinants of Salience of Energy Issues

Abstract

Studies show that salience of an issue influences the behavior of political elites, policy responses, and the attitudes of the public. Yet while the effects of salience are given considerable attention, less is known about the factors that produce salience. Specifically, what are the determinants of an issue's salience? We examine salience of energy issues in the United States over the past six decades and make two contributions. First, we provide systematic explanations of issue salience. Second, contrary to popular conceptions that energy salience is driven entirely by gasoline prices, or some scholarly analyses that salience depends on crises, we argue that other factors increase salience. Specifically, we find that political actors and activities increase energy salience, even after controlling for higher gas prices and shocks. This is an important finding; political dynamics enhance salience. Meaningful political action, therefore, driven by enhanced salience, is not entirely dependent on market forces or unplanned events.

Public opinion change after the Fukushima nuclear accident: The role of national context revisited

“…Therefore, this finding cannot be compared with other studies. While previous research has shown that focusing events increase salience of the energy issue (Lowry and Joslyn, 2014), this study demonstrates that pre-event salience affects public opinion change after a focusing event. The results further indicate that effect of salience on opinion change is a direct, rather than a mediated, effect.…”

Public opinion in policy contexts. A comparative analysis of domestic energy policies and individual policy preferences in Europe

“…Energy policy is a rather distant issue for many people: energy literacy (Brounen et al, 2013) and knowledge of the functioning of energy policies (Stadelmann-Steffen and Dermont, 2018) have been shown to be rather low. 3 Moreover, the energy issue often commands a lower priority than more salient issues (Lowry and Joslyn, 2014) like migration or unemployment. 4 Yet, for some groups, energy policy may be highly visible and proximate, which should strengthen the link between existing policies and these individuals’ policy preferences.…”

Explaining Participation Bias in the European Commission's Online Consultations: The Struggle for Policy Gain without too Much Pain

“…Salient issues affect the interests of a larger part of the public and are also more prominent in the policy agenda (Gormley, ; Lowry and Joslyn, ; Rasmussen et al ., ). They are therefore likely to be relevant to the constituencies of a wider range of interest groups, which increases the potential benefits of participating.…”