1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02229762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determinants of entry and exit rates into U.S. manufacturing industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mata and Portugal (1994) argued that industry growth, consistently, has a positive effect on firm duration, indicating that, after the effect of turnover is taken into account, fast growing industries offer a less hostile environment for the entering firms. Empirical support to this argument is also provided by a large number of studies (Austin and Rosenbaum, 1990;Doi, 1999;Dunne and Roberts, 1991;Segarra and Callejon, 2002). On the other hand, Audretsch et al (2000) report a negative relationship between sector growth and firm survival that they attribute to greater uncertainty characterizing high growth industries.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Firm Survivalmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Mata and Portugal (1994) argued that industry growth, consistently, has a positive effect on firm duration, indicating that, after the effect of turnover is taken into account, fast growing industries offer a less hostile environment for the entering firms. Empirical support to this argument is also provided by a large number of studies (Austin and Rosenbaum, 1990;Doi, 1999;Dunne and Roberts, 1991;Segarra and Callejon, 2002). On the other hand, Audretsch et al (2000) report a negative relationship between sector growth and firm survival that they attribute to greater uncertainty characterizing high growth industries.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Firm Survivalmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The dominant framework presumes that each firm behaves with the objective of profit maximization, and exits from market occur when the profit (or expected/revealed profit) is below some threshold (Jovanovic, 1982;Ghemawat and Nalebuff, 1985;Frank, 1988;Klepper, 1996;Das and Das, 1996). Thus, in empirical studies, exits have firstly been supposed to be linked with economic variables such as the rate of growth or contraction rate of the market, the level or change of the price-cost margin (or other profit measures), strength of entry and exit barriers, and firm size (e.g., Mansfield, 1962;Shapiro and Khemani, 1987;Austin and Rosenbaum, 1990). 4 There are several Japanese studies that follow this approach (Kusuda, Yokokura and Negoro, 1979;Morikawa and Tachibanaki, 1997;Honjo, 1999a;and Doi, 1999).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Other studies use lagged dependent variables as covariates (e.g., Shapiro and Khemani, 1987;Austin and Rosenbaum, 1990;Evans and Siegfried, 1992;Fotopoulos and Spence, 1998). However, their goal is not to analyse short-term dynamics (rather, they tend to interpret the associated coefficients as long-term effects) but to cope with identification, endogeneity and/or data availability problems.…”
Section: Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 96%